ADD TO PC
BUILD

Hp-pavilion KT527AA-ABM m9350la

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	55.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Hp-pavilion KT527AA-ABM m9350la (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON Benicia
Memory	2.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20080328
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 14 '17 at 19:50
Run Duration	121 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	40.5% Average	Memory 63.7 1-Core 27.7 2-Core 55.1 34% 48.8 Pts	4-Core 103 8-Core 104 14% 103 Pts	64-Core 103 6% 103 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
KINGSTON 240GB 1,204 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 147GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3F Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2254 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 326 (64) Unknown 100 100 2154752 (65) Unknown 100 100 409056 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 140 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 98 98 666 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1308 (B7) Unknown 100 100 9 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 29 100 146029871133 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 98 98 2 (E9) Unknown 100 100 3579 (EA) Unknown 100 100 1936 (F1) Unknown 100 100 2845 (F2) Unknown 100 100 3440 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 0	55.6% Above average	Read 261 Write 246 Mixed 149 49% 219 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 37.4 4K Mixed 18.2 79% 26.3 MB/s	DQ Read 172 DQ Write 121 DQ Mixed 49.3 63% 114 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 93%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 115GB free Firmware: CC44 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 148141176 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6388 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 65 60 3476732 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 7205 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1766 (B7) Unknown 99 99 1 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 63 522059807 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 314 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 81 81 38877 (C2) HDA temperature 31 40 55834574879 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 69307887256866 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2983379378 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3992235797	74.3% Very good	Read 135 Write 124 Mixed 110 92% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.87 4K Write 1.04 4K Mixed 0.25 83% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 112%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 94GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 18 (03) Spinup time 156 153 5191 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5304 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 15903 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3702 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 416 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5304 (C2) HDA temperature 112 100 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	30.6% Below average	Read 49.6 Write 56.3 Mixed 48.5 39% 51.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.37 110% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x1GB 54,972 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	16.2% Very poor	MC Read 6.2 MC Write 4.5 MC Mixed 4.6 15% 5.1 GB/s	SC Read 4.4 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 4.5 13% 4.43 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 16.2% Great: 28%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback