Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics71.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive95% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemGigabyte X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF  (all builds)
Memory57.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170914
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 25 '17 at 23:02
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 66%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820X-$375
CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Memory 75.3
1-Core 119
2-Core 253
81% 149 Pts
4-Core 471
8-Core 794
77% 633 Pts
64-Core 1,398
87% 1,398 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
EVGA(3842 3988) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1557 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.53
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Lighting 92.4
Reflection 88.2
Parallax 79.7
75% 86.7 fps
MRender 82.7
Gravity 80.1
Splatting 71.2
63% 78 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
477GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
293% Outstanding
Read 2,662
Write 1,915
Mixed 1,918
480% 2,165 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 45.3
193% 75.4 MB/s
DQ Read 39
DQ Write 461
DQ Mixed 28.6
88% 176 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 293%
Great: 353%
Samsung SSD 512GB
321GB free
Firmware: EXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 524
Write 497
Mixed 509
114% 510 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 99.7
4K Mixed 23.4
135% 52.5 MB/s
DQ Read 339
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 156
134% 205 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 101%
Great: 128%
Samsung SSD 512GB
323GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
95% Outstanding
Read 524
Write 497
Mixed 506
114% 509 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 97.1
4K Mixed 23.6
133% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 36.2
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 150
102% 120 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 95%
Great: 128%
Samsung SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 256GB-$223
127GB free
Firmware: BXW2500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
194% Outstanding
Read 1,940
Write 1,199
Mixed 1,410
336% 1,516 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 83.2
4K Mixed 24
132% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 38.4
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 24.3
38% 69.7 MB/s
Poor: 109%
This bench: 194%
Great: 220%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2133 C14 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
90.4% Outstanding
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 49.8
MC Mixed 29.6
103% 36 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 21.8
SC Mixed 10.2
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 89.8
45% 89.8 ns
Poor: 90%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $878
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $490Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback