Asus Z170-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics34.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Z170-E  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160627
Uptime18.2 Days
Run DateNov 02 '17 at 22:46
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 126
2-Core 231
82% 146 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 602
62% 502 Pts
64-Core 602
37% 602 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.8% Below average
Lighting 43
Reflection 46
Parallax 38.9
35% 42.6 fps
MRender 42.6
Gravity 39.6
Splatting 43.3
34% 41.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
305GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 413
Mixed 416
99% 447 MB/s
4K Read 46.3
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 47.3
185% 65.1 MB/s
DQ Read 46.6
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 115
103% 147 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 109%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 409
Mixed 408
98% 443 MB/s
4K Read 45.6
4K Write 95.5
4K Mixed 40.4
171% 60.5 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 79.1
114% 210 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 109%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
3TB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 156
Mixed 155
125% 166 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.85
4K Mixed 0.25
95% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
118GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 132
Write 142
Mixed 131
102% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.56
4K Mixed 0.35
97% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GB-$25
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
34.3% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 10.1
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 10.2
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170-E Builds (Compare 1,834 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $455
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback