Asus X99-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics64% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive203% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus X99-A  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150515
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 07 '17 at 10:42
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-5820K-$315
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
76.5% Very good
SC Int 97.6
SC Float 103
SC Mixed 98.2
80% 99.5 Pts
QC Int 383
QC Float 398
QC Mixed 368
87% 383 Pts
MC Int 753
MC Float 796
MC Mixed 779
116% 776 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$260
Nvidia(10DE 1131) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
64% Good
Lighting 198
Reflection 175
Parallax 194
61% 189 fps
MRender 152
Gravity 184
Splatting 124
66% 154 fps
Poor: 52%
This bench: 64%
Great: 71%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$124
147GB free
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SYSTEM 4KALIGNED
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
203% Outstanding
Read 1,944
Write 1,140
Mixed 1,174
313% 1,419 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 76.3
4K Mixed 32.5
128% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 437
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 133
164% 292 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 203%
Great: 270%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$78
423GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
NCQ 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 76.5
Write 66.7
Mixed 73.6
54% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.58
4K Mixed 0.32
84% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 57%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$20
32GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 144
Write 51.4
Mixed 62.1
92% 85.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.24
4K Write 1.79
4K Mixed 0.82
108% 2.62 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2400 C15 4x4GB-$202
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
71.8% Very good
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 24.3
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 19.8
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 106%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X99-A Builds (Compare 1,644 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus X99-A - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $1,107
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $280Nvidia GTX 1070 $430Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $88
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $285AMD RX 480 $265Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $113
Intel Core i5-7600K $215Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $140
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $205SanDisk Extreme 64GB $40
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $1,050SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $215SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $10
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback