| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H61M-PRO (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20141125 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 13 '17 at 16:42 |
| Run Duration | 89 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 31% |
PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
75%
Very good
|
71% 120 Pts
|
46% 339 Pts
|
22% 350 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 270X-$199
Sapphire(174B E272) 2GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7.1
|
28.4%
Poor
|
29% 37.3 fps
|
27% 31.9 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
40.2%
Average
|
51% 68 MB/s
|
99% 0.74 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown PSD34G16002 830B M2F4G64CB8HB5N-CG 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
51.3%
Above average
|
50% 17.5 GB/s
|
44% 15.4 GB/s
|
60% 66.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61M-PRO Builds (Compare 220 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H61M-PRO
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 30x |
| Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples | 29x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 25x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 29x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 22x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 14x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 97% - Outstanding | Total price: $59 |