Asus M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics53.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120809
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 15 '17 at 02:45
Run Duration277 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 820
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
61.2% Good
Memory 92
1-Core 45.8
2-Core 91.5
51% 76.4 Pts
4-Core 180
8-Core 180
24% 180 Pts
64-Core 179
11% 179 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
Zotac(19DA 1314) 3GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.4% Above average
Lighting 66
Reflection 64.3
Parallax 83.6
54% 71.3 fps
MRender 77.9
Gravity 73.3
Splatting 48.7
53% 66.6 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210
336GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 380
Write 329
Mixed 352
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 27.2
4K Mixed 22.3
77% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 102
99% 159 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
59GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Read 512
Write 456
Mixed 485
108% 484 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 33.3
4K Mixed 20.7
80% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 77.1
86% 147 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 116%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
11GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 495
Write 321
Mixed 338
85% 384 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 20.6
4K Mixed 17.6
71% 21 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 58
68% 121 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 126%
WD WD30EURS-63SPKY0 3TB
741GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 104
Write 111
Mixed 109
81% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 1.86
4K Mixed 0.24
76% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 82%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52
228GB free
Firmware: CC52 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 138
Write 151
Mixed 135
106% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.11
4K Mixed 0.18
58% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 83%
Great: 96%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB
958GB free, PID ab26
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
43% Average
Read 71.6
Write 97.2
Mixed 25.3
82% 64.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 3.69
4K Mixed 0.42
142% 1.54 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 43%
Great: 54%
Adata DashDrive Elite UE700 128GB-$41
9GB free, PID de7a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 196
Write 113
Mixed 111
164% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 0.003
4K Mixed 0.15
6% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
38.6% Below average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 14.7
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 10.8
25% 8.8 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3 Builds (Compare 180 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3 - $178

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $446
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback