Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	13.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	69.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130711
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 19 '17 at 00:02
Run Duration	197 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3330 51,926 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	80.4% Excellent	Memory 94.6 1-Core 99.1 2-Core 198 76% 130 Pts	4-Core 384 8-Core 387 52% 386 Pts	64-Core 392 24% 392 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3733) CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 1977 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 375.95 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	13.4% Very poor	Lighting 3.1 Reflection 33.7 Parallax 41 2% 26 fps	MRender 43 Gravity 44.9 Splatting 39.4 34% 42.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 184GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3206 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1168 (B1) Unknown 99 99 31 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 58 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 13 (EB) Unknown 99 99 160 (F1) Unknown 99 99 9945723954	69.2% Good	Read 377 Write 369 Mixed 348 81% 364 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 42.7 4K Mixed 18.9 85% 29 MB/s	DQ Read 169 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 69.8 70% 114 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 124%
Toshiba Q300 480GB-$152 5,920 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 172GB free Firmware: SAFM12.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1023 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 745 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 14 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 199 199 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 45 (C2) HDA temperature 72 58 180389347356	44.4% Average	Read 356 Write 204 Mixed 178 54% 246 MB/s	4K Read 17.9 4K Write 22.5 4K Mixed 5.41 46% 15.3 MB/s	DQ Read 178 DQ Write 33.5 DQ Mixed 21.5 38% 77.8 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 99%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 401GB free Firmware: 3B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 154 150 5258 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2499 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 5314 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1387 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 370 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2459 (C2) HDA temperature 104 89 43 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	56.2% Above average	Read 111 Write 85 Mixed 79.5 69% 91.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.57 4K Mixed 0.37 90% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 62%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 313GB free Firmware: 0A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 124 111 6800 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4968 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 9762 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3585 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 378 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 142 142 175813 (C2) HDA temperature 107 92 40 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	41.8% Average	Read 67.3 Write 78.3 Mixed 74.1 55% 73.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.16 4K Mixed 0.23 63% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 57%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB 105 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 23GB free, PID null Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	36.6% Below average	Read 95.4 Write 94.3 Mixed 95.2 123% 94.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 0.69 4K Mixed 0.2 32% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 11,344 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	73.1% Very good	MC Read 26.8 MC Write 27.2 MC Mixed 24.7 75% 26.2 GB/s	SC Read 18.9 SC Write 17.6 SC Mixed 19.2 53% 18.6 GB/s	Latency 58.3 69% 58.3 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,002 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $165

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	1,521x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	948x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	556x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	309x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	268x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	237x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	173x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	140x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	107x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	90x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	86x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	81x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $581

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16