PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 41.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 85% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | MSI MS-7893 |
Motherboard | MSI 990FXA GAMING (MS-7893) (all builds) |
Memory | 13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20151224 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 19 '17 at 08:57 |
Run Duration | 174 Seconds |
Run User | SWE-User |
Background CPU | 7% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
69%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1635 MHz, MLim: 1982 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
41.5%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
85%
Excellent
|
||||
46%
Average
|
||||
46.9%
Average
|
||||
49.1%
Average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
50%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 119x |
FX-8370AMD $175Bench 62%, 34,720 samples | 43x |
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples | 27x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 20x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 18x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 17x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 61% - Good | Total price: $358 |