Asus M2N-TE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics9.83% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M2N-TE  (all builds)
Memory2.9 GB free of 5 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20071002
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 19 '17 at 14:22
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4800+-$150
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Memory 22.9
1-Core 31.4
2-Core 48.7
20% 34.3 Pts
4-Core 43.6
8-Core 57.6
6% 50.6 Pts
64-Core 63.3
4% 63.3 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Gigabyte(1458 351A) 1GB
CLim: 970 MHz, MLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
9.83% Terrible
Lighting 10.7
Reflection 13.6
Parallax 8.66
9% 11 fps
MRender 15.9
Gravity 12.2
Splatting 15.4
12% 14.5 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.83%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3500830AS 500GB-$145
279GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AA
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
25.9% Poor
Read 44
Write 46.3
Mixed 37.5
32% 42.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.23
4K Write 0.87
4K Mixed 0.19
47% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 5GB
null MHz
512, 2048, 512, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
15.2% Very poor
MC Read 5.8
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 5.3
16% 5.5 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 3.5
11% 3.9 GB/s
Latency 300
13% 300 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback