Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	32.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom D525-$250 2,196 User benchmarks, average bench 23% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	23.4% Poor	Memory 43.2 1-Core 7.2 2-Core 13.9 18% 21.4 Pts	4-Core 23.4 8-Core 23.5 3% 23.5 Pts	64-Core 23.6 2% 23.6 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 52GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5918 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 24 (B1) Unknown 99 99 19 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 46 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 16 (F1) Unknown 99 99 6832331547	32.8% Below average	Read 181 Write 156 Mixed 156 37% 164 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 17.3 4K Mixed 11.2 49% 15.1 MB/s	DQ Read 25.4 DQ Write 32.5 DQ Mixed 13.4 14% 23.7 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 124%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 800 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 730GB free, PID a20c Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Read 26.3 Write 21.7 Mixed 13.3 25% 20.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.52 4K Mixed 0.18 60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x4GB 154,807 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	10.8% Very poor	MC Read 4.2 MC Write 3.2 MC Mixed 3.3 10% 3.57 GB/s	SC Read 0.8 SC Write 3.4 SC Mixed 3 7% 2.4 GB/s	Latency 188 21% 188 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16