Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME

Performance Results


Gaming 78% Battleship	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 79% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	78.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	72.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Motherboard	Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME (all builds)
Memory	29 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20170331
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 27 '17 at 01:36
Run Duration	300 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5960X-$285 15,468 User benchmarks, average bench 80% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	97.5% Outstanding	Memory 93.7 1-Core 136 2-Core 271 93% 167 Pts	4-Core 543 8-Core 1070 95% 807 Pts	64-Core 1,429 88% 1,429 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 97.5% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615 15,621 User benchmarks, average bench 75% EVGA(3842 2990) CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 388.31 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	78.1% Very good	Lighting 102 Reflection 108 Parallax 96.1 83% 102 fps	MRender 85.1 Gravity 92.9 Splatting 76.7 69% 84.9 fps
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 83%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: 541ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 15211306 (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 20598663157308 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5332 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 156 (B1) Unknown 0 0 97 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 25 57 55838310425 (C2) HDA temperature 25 57 55838310425 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 15211306 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 15211306 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 15211306 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 14025 (EA) Unknown 0 0 12740 (F1) Unknown 0 0 12740 (F2) Unknown 0 0 10221	72.8% Very good	Read 479 Write 184 Mixed 211 64% 291 MB/s	4K Read 26.1 4K Write 85 4K Mixed 22 113% 44.4 MB/s	DQ Read 211 DQ Write 195 DQ Mixed 67 88% 158 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 87%
Apple HDD HTS541075A9E662 750GB 190 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 0GB free Firmware: JA2AB5D0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 178 178 73014444033 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 4072 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 4417 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 3611 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 755918635058 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 93 93 70716 (C2) HDA temperature 253 253 219043725335 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 648 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (FE) Unknown 75 75 6478	41.9% Average	Read 73.8 Write 71.9 Mixed 73.7 55% 73.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.39 4K Mixed 0.19 69% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 48%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 1,630 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 600GB free, PID 2322 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	48.2% Average	Read 101 Write 94.7 Mixed 51.5 100% 82.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.48 4K Write 4.09 4K Mixed 0.49 162% 2.02 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 48%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 16GB 879 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 13GB free, PID cb10 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	4.37% Terrible	Read 18.7 Write 7 Mixed 6.34 11% 10.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.006 4K Write 0.04 4K Mixed 0.03 2% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.37% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 4x8GB-$165 6,271 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	71.1% Very good	MC Read 30.2 MC Write 22.2 MC Mixed 22.8 72% 25.1 GB/s	SC Read 16.9 SC Write 22.4 SC Mixed 21.7 58% 20.3 GB/s	Latency 60.6 66% 60.6 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical RAMPAGE V EXTREME Builds (Compare 2,058 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 101%

UFO

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 90%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME - $122

CPU
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	559x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	528x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	470x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	216x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	199x
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	123x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	79x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	61x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	60x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GBCorsair $92Bench 85%, 8,498 samples	36x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2800 C16 4x4GBCorsair $210Bench 88%, 3,970 samples	34x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GBCorsair $115Bench 88%, 5,380 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $864

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16