Asus N750JK

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	81.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Asus N750JK (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK N750JK
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140521
Uptime	7.5 Days
Run Date	Nov 29 '17 at 16:23
Run Duration	117 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370 42,062 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	53.8% Above average	Memory 63.9 1-Core 93.3 2-Core 156 60% 104 Pts	4-Core 236 8-Core 347 36% 292 Pts	64-Core 362 22% 362 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 129D) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549 Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	2.78% Terrible	Lighting 2.63 Reflection 15.3 Parallax 4.31 2% 7.42 fps	MRender 6.67 Gravity 1.93 Splatting 5.83 4% 4.81 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.78% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-256M6S 2.5 7mm 256GB 11,477 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: DC81605 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4735 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2549 (B1) Unknown 100 100 573611 (B2) Unknown 100 100 15 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 15 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 55 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 78 78 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 1903120 (F2) Unknown 100 100 709363	81.7% Excellent	Read 482 Write 404 Mixed 435 98% 440 MB/s	4K Read 26.1 4K Write 50.4 4K Mixed 16 87% 30.8 MB/s	DQ Read 295 DQ Write 261 DQ Mixed 95.2 122% 217 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 101%
Hitachi HTS541515A9E630 1.5TB 2,360 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1TB free Firmware: KA0OA500 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 122 122 94489280514 (04) Start/Stop count 1 1 232110 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 65 65 15614 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 2550 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 19 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 54 54 469285 (C2) HDA temperature 206 206 210453069853 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	58.5% Above average	Read 102 Write 101 Mixed 97.1 76% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 1.78 4K Mixed 0.18 77% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GB 22,647 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	42.2% Average	MC Read 15.2 MC Write 16.4 MC Mixed 15.1 44% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 10.3 SC Mixed 10.3 27% 9.53 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N750JK Builds (Compare 270 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus N750JK

CPU
Core i7-4700HQIntel $370Bench 62%, 42,062 samples	180x
Core i7-4710HQIntelBench 58%, 69,536 samples	73x
Core i5-4200HIntelBench 57%, 11,882 samples	17x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	166x
GTX 850MNvidiaBench 14%, 13,931 samples	104x

SSD
LCS-256M6S 2.5 7mm 256GBLiteonitBench 83%, 11,477 samples	26x
RBU-SC100S37256GD 256GBKingstonBench 63%, 982 samples	18x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	17x

RAM
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 52%, 22,647 samples	82x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	76x
HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 51%, 18,309 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $370

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16