Asus G751JT

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	21.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Asus G751JT (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G751JT
Memory	27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151102
Uptime	6.7 Days
Run Date	Dec 01 '17 at 16:27
Run Duration	206 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	66%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4720HQ 80,960 User benchmarks, average bench 58% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	72.6% Very good	Memory 82.6 1-Core 101 2-Core 193 72% 126 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 540 54% 439 Pts	64-Core 535 33% 535 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970M 6,247 User benchmarks, average bench 31% Asus(1043 22DA) 3GB CLim: 1038 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.31 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	21.5% Poor	Lighting 24.9 Reflection 28.8 Parallax 23.4 20% 25.7 fps	MRender 28.6 Gravity 24.9 Splatting 32.5 24% 28.7 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 21.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 186GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 498 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 187 (B1) Unknown 99 99 3 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 49 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 7 (F1) Unknown 99 99 7553973687	109% Outstanding	Read 506 Write 393 Mixed 420 98% 440 MB/s	4K Read 42.1 4K Write 75.9 4K Mixed 45.1 162% 54.4 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 261 DQ Mixed 129 149% 258 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 83GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1973 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 407 (B1) Unknown 99 99 14 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 45 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 49 (F1) Unknown 99 99 16701582142	74.6% Very good	Read 267 Write 207 Mixed 217 51% 230 MB/s	4K Read 36.6 4K Write 63.2 4K Mixed 40.2 140% 46.6 MB/s	DQ Read 197 DQ Write 150 DQ Mixed 103 96% 150 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 134%
OCZ Trion 150 240GB-$196 15,660 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 25GB free Firmware: SAFZ12.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2260 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 973 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 200 200 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 225 (C2) HDA temperature 71 48 223339479069 (F1) Unknown 100 100 61169	47.6% Average	Read 261 Write 175 Mixed 185 46% 207 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 35.4 4K Mixed 9.52 67% 23 MB/s	DQ Read 194 DQ Write 130 DQ Mixed 46.3 66% 123 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 95%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 64GB 316 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 13GB free, PID 0747 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	17.1% Very poor	Read 44.9 Write 29.7 Mixed 21.6 37% 32.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.66 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.74 77% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905428-123.A00LF Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 9905428-123.A00LF Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 32GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	56.4% Above average	MC Read 21.4 MC Write 21.4 MC Mixed 17 57% 19.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 15.4 SC Mixed 18.7 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 75.8 53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G751JT Builds (Compare 634 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

System: Asus G751JT

CPU
Core i7-4710HQIntelBench 58%, 69,536 samples	371x
Core i7-4720HQIntelBench 58%, 80,960 samples	210x
Core i7-4750HQIntelBench 63%, 5,497 samples	51x

GPU
GTX 970MNvidiaBench 31%, 21,995 samples	468x
GeForce GTX 970MNvidiaBench 31%, 6,247 samples	165x
GTX 980MNvidiaBench 41%, 14,160 samples	1x

SSD
X300s Non-Secure 256GBSanDiskBench 82%, 2,451 samples	60x
X300s Non-Secure 128GBSanDiskBench 75%, 1,499 samples	50x
SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 256GBSamsung $223Bench 175%, 7,621 samples	17x

RAM
HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 51%, 18,309 samples	122x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 30,591 samples	106x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 52%, 34,976 samples	61x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16