HP 860-011nf

Performance Results


Gaming 58% Gunboat	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	65.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	81.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP 860-011nf (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 2B4B
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150908
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 11 '17 at 20:40
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	97%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6600K-$81 342,244 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	83.2% Excellent	Memory 89.8 1-Core 103 2-Core 69.2 61% 87.3 Pts	4-Core 449 8-Core 409 58% 429 Pts	64-Core 447 28% 447 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 83.2% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% HP(103C 2B62) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.59 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	65.7% Good	Lighting 93.5 Reflection 100 Parallax 87 76% 93.5 fps	MRender 59.5 Gravity 56.3 Splatting 52.4 46% 56.1 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$55 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 176GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3545 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1344 (B1) Unknown 91 91 45 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 43 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 21 (F1) Unknown 99 99 14981693242	81.7% Excellent	Read 494 Write 274 Mixed 276 77% 348 MB/s	4K Read 38.3 4K Write 51.2 4K Mixed 25 117% 38.2 MB/s	DQ Read 322 DQ Write 141 DQ Mixed 58.8 89% 174 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80 112,118 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2TB free Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 111 99 29793072 (03) Spinup time 95 93 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 270 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 61 60 1464269 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 244 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 136 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 59 488374301 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1936 (C2) HDA temperature 29 41 68719476765 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 36429912604794 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2790424997 (F2) Unknown 100 253 28852375736	101% Outstanding	Read 186 Write 166 Mixed 167 130% 173 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.19 82% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 114%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 195GB free Firmware: MS2OA7C0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 95 0 (02) Throughput performance 142 100 71 (03) Spinup time 125 100 12896960696 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 485 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 115 100 34 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 523 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 299 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (B9) Unknown 100 100 62116 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 59 522190879 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 486 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 486 (C2) HDA temperature 193 146 176094838815 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	75.5% Very good	Read 141 Write 122 Mixed 114 94% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 1.18 4K Mixed 0.22 71% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905678-024.A00G Samsung M378A5143DB0-CPB 9905678-024.A00G Samsung M378A5143DB0-CPB 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	70.5% Very good	MC Read 25.1 MC Write 26.9 MC Mixed 23.9 72% 25.3 GB/s	SC Read 17.4 SC Write 30.4 SC Mixed 9.1 54% 19 GB/s	Latency 67.5 59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 74%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 860-011nf Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 60%

Destroyer

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 48%

Yacht

System: HP 860-011nf

CPU
Core i5-6600KIntel $81Bench 72%, 342,244 samples	10x

GPU
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples	8x
GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	1x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	1x

SSD
750 EVO 250GBSamsung $55Bench 94%, 75,831 samples	1x
SSDNow UV400 120GBKingston $35Bench 67%, 80,916 samples	1x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	1x

RAM
M378A5143DB0-CPB 2x4GBSamsungBench 69%, 2,652 samples	6x
M378A1G43EB1-CPB M378A1G43DB0-CPB 16GBSamsungBench 76%, 102 samples	1x
9905678-024.A00G Samsung M378A5143DB0-CPB 9905678-024.A00G Samsung M378A5143DB0-CPB 16GBKingstonBench 72%, 3 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 40% - Average

Total price: $696

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16