| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 20.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 46.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asus P6T WS PRO (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20100924 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 13 '17 at 16:00 |
| Run Duration | 109 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
69.7%
Good
|
67% 112 Pts
|
42% 332 Pts
|
25% 409 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 570-$350
Gainward(10B0 0401) 1.2GB
CLim: 732 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 388.13
|
20.8%
Poor
|
20% 29.8 fps
|
22% 27.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
46.3%
Average
|
39% 175 MB/s
|
89% 28.4 MB/s
|
20% 34.7 MB/s
|
|
|
65%
Good
|
81% 108 MB/s
|
107% 1.2 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 6 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
33.9%
Below average
|
32% 11.2 GB/s
|
26% 9 GB/s
|
58% 68.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P6T WS PRO Builds (Compare 253 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P6T WS PRO
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples | 45x |
| Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples | 33x |
| Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples | 28x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 18x |
| GTX 680Nvidia $360Bench 32%, 38,995 samples | 15x |
| GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples | 15x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 66% - Good | Total price: $290 |