Supermicro X9SCL/X9SCM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

System	Supermicro X9SCL/X9SCM (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X9SCL/X9SCM
Memory	17.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20150220
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 09 '18 at 07:31
Run Duration	456 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1280 V2 484 User benchmarks, average bench 75% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	68.5% Good	Memory 78.5 1-Core 108 2-Core 178 71% 121 Pts	4-Core 317 8-Core 451 48% 384 Pts	64-Core 494 31% 494 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 83%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB 8,189 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2TB free Firmware: CC96 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 99 238197032 (03) Spinup time 92 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1649 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 70 61 12483869 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 8736 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 196 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 94 219046674483 (BD) vendor-specific 94 94 6 (BE) vendor-specific 73 41 -3823894501 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 85 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 6233 (C2) HDA temperature 27 59 68719476763 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 99 238197032 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 140569984636263 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1673908803 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2194024628	54.3% Above average	Read 98.5 Write 90.8 Mixed 93.8 71% 94.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 0.96 4K Mixed 0.19 65% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 74%
Hitachi HUA72303 3TB 237 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 1TB free Firmware: MKAO Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 135 135 84 (03) Spinup time 142 142 30097736261 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 319 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 123 123 31 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3026 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 140 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 325 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 325 (C2) HDA temperature 181 181 201864773665 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	56.8% Above average	Read 112 Write 86 Mixed 75.3 68% 91.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 0.68 4K Mixed 0.2 60% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 88%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 4TB 6,400 User benchmarks, average bench 159% 477GB free Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: Unknown Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	80.2% Excellent	Read 155 Write 124 Mixed 91.8 92% 124 MB/s	4K Read 1.16 4K Write 2.84 4K Mixed 0.67 175% 1.55 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 236%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB 8,189 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 377GB free Firmware: CC97 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 116 99 104765208 (03) Spinup time 93 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2575 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 73 60 24756184 (09) Power-on hours count 65 65 31403 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 213 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 1 5540599061848 (BD) vendor-specific 95 95 5 (BE) vendor-specific 70 36 -3773300706 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 99 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 5633 (C2) HDA temperature 30 64 73014444062 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 20 6 104765208 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 73684458939844 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2043458705 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1469878735	57.9% Above average	Read 104 Write 97.7 Mixed 95.5 75% 99.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 0.74 4K Mixed 0.11 42% 0.41 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 74%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 272GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 78 63 62268508 (03) Spinup time 98 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 308 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 81 60 141890080 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 3343 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 196 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 8590065667 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 78 56 437190678 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 449 (C2) HDA temperature 22 12 51539607574 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 1 1 62268508 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -63389422318378 (F1) Unknown 100 253 15169886819 (F2) Unknown 100 253 15132496365
Poor: 60% Great: 113%
Patriot Memory 64GB 1,048 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 55GB free, PID 5500 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	8.84% Terrible	Read 28.1 Write 10.7 Mixed 13.5 19% 17.4 MB/s	4K Read 2.69 4K Write 0.59 4K Mixed 0.43 45% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.84% Great: 57%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 16GB-$8 10,486 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 14GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	9.25% Terrible	Read 23 Write 6.19 Mixed 11.3 14% 13.5 MB/s	4K Read 2.83 4K Write 1.27 4K Mixed 0.62 74% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.25% Great: 31%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 16GB-$8 10,486 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 14GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	10.9% Very poor	Read 27.3 Write 8.76 Mixed 11 17% 15.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.03 4K Write 1.32 4K Mixed 0.73 84% 2.02 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 31%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 18JSF51272AZ-1G4D1 Hynix HMT41GU7BFR8C-RD 18JSF51272AZ-1G4D1 Hynix HMT41GU7BFR8C-RD 24GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	49.7% Average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 17.4 MC Mixed 15.5 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 16 47% 16.6 GB/s	Latency 83.4 48% 83.4 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X9SCL/X9SCM Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

System: Supermicro X9SCL/X9SCM

CPU
Xeon E3-1270 V2IntelBench 73%, 3,610 samples	4x
Xeon E3-1230 V2Intel $266Bench 70%, 8,235 samples	3x
Xeon E3-1220 V2Intel $305Bench 69%, 3,748 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon RX 560-BAMDBench 20%, 49,289 samples	3x
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	3x
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	2x

SSD
M4 512GBCrucial $74Bench 67%, 4,600 samples	1x
SSD 128GBBench 64%, 3,975 samples	1x
830 256GBSamsung $261Bench 72%, 25,763 samples	1x

RAM
M391B5273CH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 50%, 159 samples	3x
M391B1G73QH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 57%, 67 samples	1x
9965525-026.A00LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 49%, 115 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 19% - Very poor

Total price: $74

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16