EVGA 152-HR-E979

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	83.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	EVGA 152-HR-E979 (all builds)
Memory	21.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151224
Uptime	3.5 Days
Run Date	Jan 10 '18 at 03:36
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348 455,746 User benchmarks, average bench 79% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	72.7% Very good	Memory 76 1-Core 108 2-Core 198 72% 127 Pts	4-Core 374 8-Core 587 59% 480 Pts	64-Core 618 38% 618 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% EVGA(3842 2989) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1557 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.71 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.2% Poor	Lighting 33 Reflection 38.2 Parallax 31 27% 34.1 fps	MRender 47.3 Gravity 33 Splatting 43.1 34% 41.1 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 2TB-$320 2,669 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 1.5TB free Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6249 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 82 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 57 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 99 99 6908122577	102% Outstanding	Read 508 Write 480 Mixed 496 111% 495 MB/s	4K Read 37.9 4K Write 96 4K Mixed 35 153% 56.3 MB/s	DQ Read 38.7 DQ Write 247 DQ Mixed 110 94% 132 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 130%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 20384 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 416 (B1) Unknown 98 98 79 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 58 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 5 (EB) Unknown 99 99 24 (F1) Unknown 99 99 29460108053	83.1% Excellent	Read 506 Write 323 Mixed 408 92% 413 MB/s	4K Read 33 4K Write 86 4K Mixed 24.5 127% 47.8 MB/s	DQ Read 34.2 DQ Write 218 DQ Mixed 75.3 73% 109 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 25GB free Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 16430 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 361 (B1) Unknown 99 99 13 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 48 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 24 (F1) Unknown 99 99 14088583228	75.7% Very good	Read 503 Write 102 Mixed 140 54% 248 MB/s	4K Read 32.8 4K Write 84.7 4K Mixed 32.9 137% 50.1 MB/s	DQ Read 259 DQ Write 96.2 DQ Mixed 78.5 84% 145 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR3 2133 C9 4x8GB 587 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	38.8% Below average	MC Read 10.7 MC Write 16.9 MC Mixed 12.4 38% 13.3 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 10.8 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 88.3 45% 88.3 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 124%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 152-HR-E979 Builds (Compare 81 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: EVGA 152-HR-E979

CPU
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	63x
Core i5-4690KIntel $53Bench 70%, 229,359 samples	5x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	4x

GPU
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	23x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	7x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	6x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $100Bench 235%, 154,949 samples	15x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $46Bench 234%, 87,206 samples	7x
CS90 0 500GB SSDPNYBench 63%, 102 samples	4x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 51%, 9,944 samples	13x
RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBG.SKILLBench 27%, 2,515 samples	8x
Sniper DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 59%, 546 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $448

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16