Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive219% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-E WS/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory60.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150911
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 14 '18 at 17:32
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$285
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Memory 92.5
1-Core 113
2-Core 210
80% 138 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 906
80% 681 Pts
64-Core 1,241
77% 1,241 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 390.65
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 68% Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 2TB-$275
2TB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Read 512
Write 369
Mixed 423
97% 435 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 39.5
4K Mixed 23
90% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 288
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 125
125% 204 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 135%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
474GB free
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 2,198
Write 1,377
Mixed 1,687
389% 1,754 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 51.1
4K Mixed 39.1
115% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 394
DQ Write 251
DQ Mixed 154
160% 267 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 223%
Great: 283%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$206
444GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 466
Mixed 511
111% 498 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 46.9
4K Mixed 33.9
104% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 135
137% 223 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 124%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
383GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
219% Outstanding
Read 2,200
Write 1,381
Mixed 1,552
379% 1,711 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 47.9
4K Mixed 35
108% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 343
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 139
141% 231 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 219%
Great: 283%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3200 C16 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
124% Outstanding
MC Read 54.8
MC Write 45.5
MC Mixed 46.2
140% 48.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 24.3
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 115%
This bench: 124%
Great: 155%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-E WS/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 260 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $770
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback