Gigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 136%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 138%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics33.3% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 8.1 is the second most recent version of Windows but it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemGigabyte X399 DESIGNARE EX
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF  (all builds)
Memory47.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20171003
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateJan 17 '18 at 01:42
Run Duration403 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD Ryzen TR 1920X-$653
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
100% Outstanding
SC Int 106
SC Float 114
SC Mixed 110
88% 110 Pts
QC Int 420
QC Float 449
QC Mixed 431
98% 433 Pts
MC Int 1,701
MC Float 1,810
MC Mixed 1,783
264% 1,765 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 100%
Great: 109%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$750
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (90 fps cap detected)
33.3% Below average
Lighting 88.9
Reflection 89.8
Parallax 88.6
28% 89.1 fps
MRender 86.9
Gravity 88.9
Splatting 94.2
38% 90 fps
Poor: 61%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 178%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$260
313GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
288% Outstanding
Read 2,404
Write 1,817
Mixed 1,812
446% 2,011 MB/s
4K Read 48.7
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 62.5
217% 77.1 MB/s
DQ Read 365
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 149
156% 259 MB/s
Poor: 208%
This bench: 288%
Great: 353%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$328
286GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 495
Write 94.8
Mixed 353
69% 314 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 55.9
4K Mixed 27.8
127% 41.6 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 81.7
95% 167 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73%
Great: 122%
Corsair Force 3 120GB-$109
181GB free
Firmware: 5.03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 388
Write 215
Mixed 239
62% 281 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 77.6
4K Mixed 17.7
101% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 61.2
91% 172 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 55%
Corsair Force 3 120GB-$109
181GB free
Firmware: 5.03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 392
Write 207
Mixed 247
62% 282 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 74.8
4K Mixed 17.5
102% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 253
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 63.1
90% 168 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 55%
Samsung 840 250GB-$192
166GB free
Firmware: DXT06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
71.6% Very good
Read 463
Write 238
Mixed 245
69% 315 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 73.4
4K Mixed 13.1
96% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 288
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 30.8
81% 174 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 84%
Samsung PM851 M.2 2280 256GB
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT25D0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 498
Write 256
Mixed 344
81% 366 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 69
4K Mixed 16.7
101% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 37.5
75% 153 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 77%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$121
131GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 412
Mixed 417
99% 446 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 69.5
4K Mixed 43.2
158% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 96.8
107% 183 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 104%
Great: 135%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$139
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01L01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 141
Write 135
Mixed 129
101% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.88
4K Write 3.33
4K Mixed 0.65
170% 1.62 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 85%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$79
1TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 115
Write 154
Mixed 157
108% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.17
64% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 109%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$139
1TB free
Firmware: 01.01L01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 148
Write 105
Mixed 105
89% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 0.41
4K Mixed 0.31
67% 0.44 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 85%
MUSHKIN MKNUFDAM32GB 32GB
8GB free, PID 5200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 161
Write 13.6
Mixed 18.4
52% 64.3 MB/s
4K Read 8.88
4K Write 1.08
4K Mixed 0.65
92% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB-$951
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
172% Outstanding
MC Read 70.3
MC Write 64.6
MC Mixed 69.3
194% 68.1 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 43.7
SC Mixed 28.1
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 85.6
47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 172%
Great: 172%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF Builds (Compare 147 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 132%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 146%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 165%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $1,710
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $320Nvidia GTX 1070 $413Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $85
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $160Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $290Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $121
Intel Core i7-7700K $300AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $162
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $166SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $951SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $59HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $219SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback