ADD TO PC
BUILD

Toshiba SATELLITE C55-A-1P6

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C55-A-1P6 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA PT10S
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140819
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 21 '18 at 11:40
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4200M-$39 33,019 User benchmarks, average bench 50% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	42.5% Average	Memory 60.6 1-Core 24.7 2-Core 39.4 30% 41.6 Pts	4-Core 134 8-Core 235 22% 184 Pts	64-Core 234 14% 234 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 710M 2,241 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Toshiba(1179 FA36) 1GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7654 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	3.94% Terrible	Lighting 4.73 Reflection 5.38 Parallax 3.84 4% 4.65 fps	MRender 4.38 Gravity 5.07 Splatting 5.35 4% 4.93 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.94% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150 105,037 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 303GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR060 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 160 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 786 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 15 (AE) Unknown 100 100 4 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 69 55 193274642463 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 99 99 1 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 7442241040 (F7) Unknown 100 100 233227670 (F8) Unknown 100 100 80163828 (B4) Unknown 0 0 1935 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	51.5% Above average	Read 457 Write 265 Mixed 296 75% 339 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 16.8 4K Mixed 12.6 47% 14.5 MB/s	DQ Read 76.7 DQ Write 46.7 DQ Mixed 23.3 28% 48.9 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 99%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 500GB 1,723 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 231GB free Firmware: 0203 Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	35.7% Below average	Read 59.1 Write 65.1 Mixed 53.1 44% 59.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 1.42 4K Mixed 0.26 70% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLS4G3N169ES4.16FE Hynix HMT451S6MFR8A-PB 8GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	45.3% Average	MC Read 15.2 MC Write 20.5 MC Mixed 17 50% 17.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 7.9 20% 7.17 GB/s	Latency 126 32% 126 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback