Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics65.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 21 '18 at 12:47
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-5820K-$386
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
110% Outstanding
SC Int 133
SC Float 134
SC Mixed 136
108% 134 Pts
QC Int 538
QC Float 534
QC Mixed 542
122% 538 Pts
MC Int 1,031
MC Float 1,101
MC Mixed 1,082
160% 1,071 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 110%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$330
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
65.3% Good
Lighting 201
Reflection 182
Parallax 200
62% 194 fps
MRender 154
Gravity 189
Splatting 126
68% 156 fps
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 73%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 403
Mixed 417
99% 444 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 87.6
4K Mixed 43.3
159% 56.3 MB/s
DQ Read 331
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 21.5
85% 193 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 106%
Great: 123%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$38
240GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 93.6
Write 122
Mixed 135
89% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.07
4K Write 2.44
4K Mixed 0.24
117% 1.25 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 107%
Hitachi HDP725016GLAT80 160GB
65GB free
Firmware: GMBOA4CA Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 66.1
Write 64.9
Mixed 66.6
50% 65.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.57
4K Mixed 0.32
87% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 42%
Fujitsu MHV2120BH PL 120GB
15GB free
Firmware: 892C Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 19.6
Write 20.7
Mixed 20.1
15% 20.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.74
4K Mixed 0.26
60% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GB-$187
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 3072 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
122% Outstanding
MC Read 47.8
MC Write 45.9
MC Mixed 45.6
133% 46.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 24.5
66% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 48.7
82% 48.7 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 122%
Great: 127%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 2,273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $1,046
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $356Nvidia GTX 1070 $344Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $110
Intel Core i5-8600K $249AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $135
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $147SanDisk Extreme 64GB $80
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $78G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $167SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $11
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback