Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics23.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 21 '18 at 17:33
Run Duration305 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$129
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 69.7
2-Core 127
58% 93.9 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 440
44% 357 Pts
64-Core 437
27% 437 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120
PwrHis(1787 2339) 2GB
CLim: 1160 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.12.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
23.2% Poor
Lighting 27.8
Reflection 31.9
Parallax 33.9
23% 31.2 fps
MRender 28.2
Gravity 24.7
Splatting 33.7
24% 28.9 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 481
Write 279
Mixed 307
78% 356 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 36.7
4K Mixed 18.4
86% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 83.8
DQ Mixed 48
56% 99.1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 108%
Seagate Expansion 500GB
163GB free
Firmware: 9300
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
16% Very poor
Read 27.7
Write 28
Mixed 29
21% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.23
4K Write 0.46
4K Mixed 0.11
30% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16%
Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
132GB free
Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 93.3
Write 85.5
Mixed 86
66% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.57
121% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 68%
VendorCo ProductCode 8GB
7GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
4.39% Terrible
Read 16.7
Write 6.59
Mixed 7.42
11% 10.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.16
4K Write 0.008
4K Mixed 0.006
8% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.39%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 C11 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.1% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 17.4
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 12.1
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $512
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback