Asus P5Q-EM

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	36.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P5Q-EM (all builds)
Memory	9.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090708
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 22 '18 at 10:49
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	24%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5470 1,638 User benchmarks, average bench 54% LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	50% Above average	Memory 67.9 1-Core 47.5 2-Core 96 44% 70.5 Pts	4-Core 188 8-Core 189 25% 188 Pts	64-Core 192 12% 192 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Device(7377 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.71 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	36.6% Below average	Lighting 47.4 Reflection 32.3 Parallax 39.8 39% 39.8 fps	MRender 38.9 Gravity 43.5 Splatting 38.1 33% 40.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 137GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z22000RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 142 100 4238 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 430 (A6) Unknown 100 100 86 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 140 (A9) Unknown 100 100 35 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 123 (AE) Unknown 100 100 83 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 70 100 257698037790 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 4 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 25097 (F1) Unknown 253 253 16252 (F2) Unknown 253 253 18341	42.6% Average	Read 215 Write 205 Mixed 210 47% 210 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 62.7 4K Mixed 2.6 72% 29.6 MB/s	DQ Read 23.4 DQ Write 58.5 DQ Mixed 2.51 13% 28.2 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 86%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40 97,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 860GB free Firmware: JP4OA39C Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 98 98 4 (02) Throughput performance 133 133 104 (03) Spinup time 127 127 21494366508 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 12221 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 132 132 34 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 62575 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 814 (C0) Power-off retract count 89 89 13231 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 89 89 13231 (C2) HDA temperature 230 230 240518823962 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	65.5% Good	Read 114 Write 114 Mixed 33.3 64% 87.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 1.23 4K Mixed 0.41 91% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 74%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40 97,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 449GB free Firmware: JP4OA39C Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 92 92 1507350 (02) Throughput performance 134 134 101 (03) Spinup time 123 123 21494956340 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 8033 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 130 130 35 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 63704 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 816 (C0) Power-off retract count 93 93 8790 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 93 93 8790 (C2) HDA temperature 230 230 287763464218 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	58.3% Above average	Read 104 Write 99.7 Mixed 84.2 72% 95.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.32 4K Write 1.12 4K Mixed 0.31 69% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 12GB 85,415 User benchmarks, average bench 35% null MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	20.2% Poor	MC Read 6.8 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 6.2 18% 6.47 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 6.4 17% 6 GB/s	Latency 106 38% 106 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 20.2% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5Q-EM Builds (Compare 60 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5Q-EM

CPU
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	13x
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples	9x
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	8x

GPU
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	9x
G45/G43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 1%, 6,554 samples	7x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	5x

SSD
Z400s 256GBSanDisk $221Bench 72%, 10,770 samples	5x
Green 120GB (2018)WD $59Bench 43%, 69,933 samples	4x
SU650 240GBAdata $70Bench 70%, 47,016 samples	4x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	34x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	8x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 20% - Very poor

Total price: $309

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16