Asus M4N68T-M

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	26.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M4N68T-M (all builds)
Memory	3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110705
Uptime	7.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 08 '18 at 15:35
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 635 5,306 User benchmarks, average bench 45% AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	49.9% Average	Memory 72 1-Core 41.5 2-Core 82.9 43% 65.5 Pts	4-Core 163 8-Core 164 22% 164 Pts	64-Core 162 10% 162 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 85D7) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	26.7% Poor	Lighting 32.7 Reflection 25.1 Parallax 34.5 27% 30.8 fps	MRender 37.8 Gravity 30.3 Splatting 31.3 27% 33.2 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
120gb S SD 120GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: P011 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	49.7% Average	Read 209 Write 203 Mixed 208 46% 207 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 52.5 4K Mixed 17.8 89% 31.9 MB/s	DQ Read 31.2 DQ Write 80.9 DQ Mixed 18.3 25% 43.5 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 48%
Seagate ST3750640AS 750GB-$60 7,916 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 192GB free Firmware: 3.AA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	24% Poor	Read 58.6 Write 25 Mixed 39.4 31% 41 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 0.35 4K Mixed 0.2 46% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 42%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95 81,608 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 15GB free Firmware: CC3C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	46.3% Average	Read 85.1 Write 76.2 Mixed 79.2 60% 80.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 0.89 4K Mixed 0.33 69% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30.8% Below average	MC Read 13.6 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 11.9 31% 10.8 GB/s	SC Read 6.8 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 8.6 20% 7.13 GB/s	Latency 96.8 41% 96.8 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4N68T-M Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4N68T-M

CPU
Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 40%, 19,471 samples	3x
Phenom II X4 945AMDBench 51%, 12,746 samples	3x
Athlon II X4 630AMDBench 45%, 7,197 samples	3x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	3x
GeForce 7025 / nForce 630aNvidiaBench 0%, 5,527 samples	3x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	3x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
SS DSA2BW120G3 120GBIntelBench 34%, 12 samples	1x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	7x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	6x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 34% - Below average

Total price: $131

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16