Asrock 990FX Killer

Performance Results


Gaming 54% Yacht	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 45% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	86.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	48.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock 990FX Killer (all builds)
Memory	8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160106
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Feb 10 '18 at 17:27
Run Duration	179 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	62.5% Good	Memory 82.1 1-Core 65.8 2-Core 122 56% 89.8 Pts	4-Core 233 8-Core 416 39% 324 Pts	64-Core 414 26% 414 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Nvidia(10DE 119E) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	86.5% Excellent	Lighting 99.1 Reflection 133 Parallax 139 81% 124 fps	MRender 114 Gravity 137 Splatting 110 98% 120 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 86.5% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39 62,883 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 118GB free Firmware: X31200RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 10714 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1167 (A5) Unknown 100 100 223393809152 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 58 (A8) Unknown 100 100 60 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 25 (AE) Unknown 100 100 143 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 78 34 146029805590 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 3577791644928 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 11478 (EA) Unknown 100 100 15890 (F1) Unknown 253 253 12485 (F2) Unknown 253 253 40860 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	48.7% Average	Read 402 Write 191 Mixed 209 59% 267 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 33.3 4K Mixed 9.19 64% 21.8 MB/s	DQ Read 22.6 DQ Write 95.4 DQ Mixed 46.1 39% 54.7 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 108%
SanDisk Extreme 120GB-$160 11,787 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: R211 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 108 108 21399158 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 7971459316561 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1964 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 569 (B1) Unknown 0 0 6 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 21 47 51542687765 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 21399158 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 21399158 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 21399158 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 95 95 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 31346 (EA) Unknown 0 0 25430 (F1) Unknown 0 0 25430 (F2) Unknown 0 0 25102	48.7% Average	Read 454 Write 127 Mixed 201 57% 260 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 43.4 4K Mixed 11.3 68% 24.9 MB/s	DQ Read 18.8 DQ Write 118 DQ Mixed 38.7 39% 58.6 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 81%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 505GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 142 142 69 (03) Spinup time 128 128 12897353897 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 7106 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 105 105 38 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 10548 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1155 (C0) Power-off retract count 95 95 7108 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 7108 (C2) HDA temperature 222 222 206159347739 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	69.8% Good	Read 123 Write 120 Mixed 114 90% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.44 4K Mixed 0.18 63% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 107%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 467GB free Firmware: 50.0AB50 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 164 157 6791 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9651 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 66 66 25146 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3048 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 234 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 11 11 569246 (C2) HDA temperature 124 95 26 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 12 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	41.2% Average	Read 73.9 Write 69.8 Mixed 74.6 55% 72.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 0.34 4K Mixed 0.11 41% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown V01D3LF4GB26826813 Team--Elite-1333 Team--Elite-1333 V01D3LF4GB26826813 16GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	36.6% Below average	MC Read 13.2 MC Write 12.5 MC Mixed 11.8 36% 12.5 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 8.6 SC Mixed 11 27% 9.5 GB/s	Latency 76.7 52% 76.7 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 990FX Killer Builds (Compare 257 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Killer - $154

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	138x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	29x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	19x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	22x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	18x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	12x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	10x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	5x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $494

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16