Asrock A320M Pro4

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	50.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock A320M Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170830
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 13 '18 at 18:02
Run Duration	288 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	74% Very good	Memory 70.1 1-Core 111 2-Core 221 74% 134 Pts	4-Core 418 8-Core 698 68% 558 Pts	64-Core 866 54% 866 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% EVGA(3842 3975) CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50.2% Above average	Lighting 72.2 Reflection 70.6 Parallax 70 59% 70.9 fps	MRender 74 Gravity 67 Splatting 0.09 34% 47 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 525GB-$140 20,154 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 195GB free Firmware: M0CR060 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 246 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 64 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (AE) Unknown 100 100 12 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 50 214749544484 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 657781854 (F7) Unknown 100 100 20558514 (F8) Unknown 100 100 13703530 (B4) Unknown 0 0 1933 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	65.9% Good	Read 474 Write 335 Mixed 334 84% 381 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 53.9 4K Mixed 11.3 80% 29.8 MB/s	DQ Read 22.4 DQ Write 139 DQ Mixed 10.7 29% 57.5 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 98%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: U21010RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 2 (09) Power-on hours count 106 100 362 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 736 (A6) Unknown 100 100 219 (A7) Unknown 100 100 2 (A8) Unknown 100 100 270 (A9) Unknown 100 100 37 (AA) Unknown 100 100 2 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 250 (AE) Unknown 100 100 225 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 58 (C2) HDA temperature 60 100 231928234024 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 1468 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 8 (E8) Unknown 100 100 99 (E9) Unknown 100 100 55708 (F1) Unknown 253 253 4105 (F2) Unknown 253 253 4422	55.2% Above average	Read 15.8 Write 398 Mixed 339 58% 251 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 69.2 4K Mixed 4.85 82% 33.4 MB/s	DQ Read 164 DQ Write 182 DQ Mixed 4.89 50% 117 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 86%
Adplus SuperVer 250GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 37GB free Firmware: 6302 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	32.2% Below average	Read 54 Write 57.9 Mixed 50.5 41% 54.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.32 4K Mixed 0.32 79% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 39%
ST350041 8AS 500GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 270GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	46% Average	Read 110 Write 112 Mixed 105 140% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.77 4K Mixed 0.52 80% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 47%
iXpand Flash Drive 32GB 330 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 3GB free, PID cffa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	29.9% Poor	Read 86.9 Write 47.1 Mixed 74.5 84% 69.5 MB/s	4K Read 6.15 4K Write 1.81 4K Mixed 1.57 138% 3.18 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB-$46 47,721 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	40.7% Average	MC Read 14.4 MC Write 13.9 MC Mixed 11.9 38% 13.4 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 15.4 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M Pro4 Builds (Compare 179 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock A320M Pro4

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	27x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	24x
Ryzen 5 1400AMD $87Bench 61%, 71,313 samples	15x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	17x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	15x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	11x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	7x
Pro 6000p NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBIntel $65Bench 104%, 11,104 samples	5x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	5x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	7x
KF3200C16D4/16GX 2x16GBKingstonBench 91%, 43,162 samples	5x
Aegis DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 83%, 37,374 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $257

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16