Asus PRIME Z370-P

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	31.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME Z370-P (all builds)
Memory	9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171201
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 14 '18 at 10:53
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	35%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$200 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	91.9% Outstanding	Memory 87.3 1-Core 136 2-Core 262 90% 162 Pts	4-Core 518 8-Core 818 82% 668 Pts	64-Core 1,004 62% 1,004 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 91.9% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	31.3% Below average	Lighting 39.3 Reflection 30.7 Parallax 35.9 32% 35.3 fps	MRender 38.6 Gravity 36.1 Splatting 35.7 30% 36.8 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB 25,072 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 275GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT21B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 5 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 14 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 56 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 2 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1185364570	72.9% Very good	Read 494 Write 227 Mixed 221 69% 314 MB/s	4K Read 26.4 4K Write 79.5 4K Mixed 27.6 118% 44.5 MB/s	DQ Read 25.1 DQ Write 138 DQ Mixed 51.6 48% 71.5 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 131%
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102 38,562 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 111GB free Firmware: 2.11 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 92 92 2799941 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 36730560319935 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1250 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 63 (B1) Unknown 0 0 3 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 128 129 545469300864 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 2799941 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 2799941 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 2799941 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 -74590697029532 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 3654 (EA) Unknown 0 0 4306 (F1) Unknown 0 0 4306 (F2) Unknown 0 0 5231	50.2% Above average	Read 206 Write 115 Mixed 114 32% 145 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 93.5 4K Mixed 14.2 103% 43.7 MB/s	DQ Read 134 DQ Write 103 DQ Mixed 32.6 48% 90.1 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 61%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 561GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 171 171 4441 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 890 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 1538 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 755 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 63 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 194 194 19810 (C2) HDA temperature 119 110 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	68.7% Good	Read 135 Write 104 Mixed 101 85% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 0.57 4K Mixed 0.2 60% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905625-036.A00G 1x16GB 149 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	38.5% Below average	MC Read 13.4 MC Write 13.5 MC Mixed 11.2 36% 12.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 12.7 SC Mixed 11.9 34% 11.8 GB/s	Latency 70.2 57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME Z370-P Builds (Compare 10,274 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 55%

Yacht

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 50%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z370-P - $94

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	3,245x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	2,395x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	1,346x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	1,147x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	939x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	750x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	299x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	295x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	269x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	452x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	282x
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	271x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $520

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16