| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 52.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 78% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
| Motherboard | Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20130116 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 15 '18 at 18:12 |
| Run Duration | 113 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
66.1%
Good
|
62% 100 Pts
|
41% 339 Pts
|
28% 445 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 290-$399
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.4.4
|
52.4%
Above average
|
53% 69.8 fps
|
50% 59.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM04B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
78%
Very good
|
99% 445 MB/s
|
89% 30.7 MB/s
|
68% 113 MB/s
|
|
|
103%
Outstanding
|
131% 174 MB/s
|
83% 0.74 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
32.1%
Below average
|
29% 10.2 GB/s
|
29% 10 GB/s
|
58% 69.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 379x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 102x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 82x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 44x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 43x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 29x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 53% - Above average | Total price: $729 |