Zoostorm 9876-3878A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics62.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive83.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemZoostorm 9876-3878A  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME Z270-P
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170206
Uptime24.2 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '18 at 13:06
Run Duration84 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Memory 92.3
1-Core 127
2-Core 247
87% 155 Pts
4-Core 467
8-Core 659
71% 563 Pts
64-Core 664
41% 664 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 384.94
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
62.3% Good
Lighting 78.1
Reflection 78.5
Parallax 66.6
64% 74.4 fps
MRender 71.9
Gravity 72.6
Splatting 74.1
60% 72.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 60%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB-$105
822GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41100WD
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 497
Write 329
Mixed 323
85% 383 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 72.9
4K Mixed 13.9
114% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 309
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 13.5
74% 172 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 25.8
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 33.9
SC Mixed 26.5
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback