Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170925
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 22 '18 at 18:01
Run Duration	232 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-8350K-$139 23,493 User benchmarks, average bench 82% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	93.1% Outstanding	Memory 97.6 1-Core 130 2-Core 261 92% 163 Pts	4-Core 510 8-Core 521 69% 515 Pts	64-Core 521 32% 521 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 93.1% Great: 93%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290 33,820 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Sapphire(174B E210) 3GB CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.2.1 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	29.6% Poor	Lighting 38.3 Reflection 27.6 Parallax 47.5 31% 37.8 fps	MRender 26.4 Gravity 35.4 Splatting 34 26% 31.9 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 32%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 196GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3FD6SD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 9 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3368 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 440 (64) Unknown 100 100 2544288 (65) Unknown 100 100 1756800 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 99 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 98 98 757 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1393 (B7) Unknown 96 96 41 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 27 100 163209674779 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 9 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 9 (E7) Temperature 91 91 9 (E9) Unknown 100 100 4612 (EA) Unknown 100 100 2358 (F1) Unknown 100 100 3664 (F2) Unknown 100 100 5539 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 9	54.6% Above average	Read 474 Write 260 Mixed 260 73% 331 MB/s	4K Read 22 4K Write 38.5 4K Mixed 7.9 64% 22.8 MB/s	DQ Read 24.9 DQ Write 49.3 DQ Mixed 21.2 21% 31.8 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 88%
Seagate ST3300831AS 300GB 1,245 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 153GB free Firmware: 3.03 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 59 49 21954137 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4188 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 87 60 481918050 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 14903 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5192 (C2) HDA temperature 34 54 47244640290 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 59 49 21954137 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 187 447 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	29.8% Poor	Read 51 Write 52.7 Mixed 49.6 38% 51.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.37 82% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 37%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 11GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	24.2% Poor	Read 136 Write 8.28 Mixed 11.1 40% 51.8 MB/s	4K Read 10.6 4K Write 0.05 4K Mixed 0.05 43% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 24.2% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x4GB 7,607 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	MC Read 39.6 MC Write 43.1 MC Mixed 31.3 108% 38 GB/s	SC Read 22.6 SC Write 43.6 SC Mixed 33.1 95% 33.1 GB/s	Latency 47.9 84% 47.9 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 93%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	1,511x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	832x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	573x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	401x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	346x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	338x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	115x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	105x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	97x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	145x
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	90x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	83x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $844

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16