Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Jet ski	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	37% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte H110M-S2H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H (all builds)
Memory	3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20170612
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 25 '18 at 13:56
Run Duration	159 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$110 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	81.4% Excellent	Memory 89.5 1-Core 107 2-Core 209 78% 135 Pts	4-Core 425 8-Core 417 56% 421 Pts	64-Core 415 26% 415 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3733) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	37% Below average	Lighting 48.2 Reflection 32.1 Parallax 39.8 39% 40.1 fps	MRender 39.2 Gravity 43 Splatting 37.5 32% 39.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
KINGSTON 120GB 834 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: 525A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 7181320 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 -21723944575878 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1948 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 30 (B1) Unknown 0 0 3 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 29 45 64427458589 (C2) HDA temperature 29 45 64427458589 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 7181320 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 7181320 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 7181320 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 9165 (EA) Unknown 0 0 7139 (F1) Unknown 0 0 7139 (F2) Unknown 0 0 9155	39% Below average	Read 161 Write 75.2 Mixed 108 25% 115 MB/s	4K Read 20.9 4K Write 74.5 4K Mixed 9.05 83% 34.8 MB/s	DQ Read 113 DQ Write 90.8 DQ Mixed 24.6 40% 76.1 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 85%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$67 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 751GB free Firmware: MS2O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 143 143 66 (03) Spinup time 123 123 12897091769 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 42 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 113 113 35 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 228 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 42 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 43 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 43 (C2) HDA temperature 171 171 180389740579 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	95.5% Outstanding	Read 166 Write 167 Mixed 154 122% 162 MB/s	4K Read 1.05 4K Write 1.84 4K Mixed 0.19 99% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 95.5% Great: 107%
WD Elements 500GB 10,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 390GB free, PID 1042 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	19% Very poor	Read 60.2 Write 37.2 Mixed 12.9 40% 36.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 0.68 4K Mixed 0.16 30% 0.42 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 19% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2400 C15 Series 2x4GB 4,971 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	70.1% Very good	MC Read 25.6 MC Write 28 MC Mixed 20.9 71% 24.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 25.2 SC Mixed 20.1 58% 20.4 GB/s	Latency 67.9 59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H110M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 4,297 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 26%

Raft

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H - $198

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	588x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	459x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	457x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	557x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	394x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	240x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	191x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	132x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	121x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	91x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	88x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	55x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $435

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16