Asrock X399 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 93% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 96% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	84.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X399 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171121
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 10 '18 at 05:00
Run Duration	245 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1900X-$110 7,071 User benchmarks, average bench 76% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	76.5% Very good	Memory 60.3 1-Core 124 2-Core 250 76% 145 Pts	4-Core 497 8-Core 775 78% 636 Pts	64-Core 1,364 84% 1,364 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 374C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 391.1 Performing below potential (47^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	123% Outstanding	Lighting 169 Reflection 190 Parallax 172 138% 177 fps	MRender 121 Gravity 170 Splatting 116 110% 136 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Neutron GTX 480GB-$400 512 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 356GB free (System drive) Firmware: M310 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 166 166 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 57 57 38198 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 429 (AB) Unknown 253 253 0 (AC) Unknown 253 253 0 (B5) Unknown 253 253 0 (B6) Unknown 253 253 0 (C2) HDA temperature 36 0 21477851172 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 98 98 3 (EA) Unknown 100 100 364513 (F1) Unknown 100 100 16149 (F2) Unknown 100 100 58383 (FA) Read error retry rate 253 253 0	84.1% Excellent	Read 502 Write 327 Mixed 458 95% 429 MB/s	4K Read 24.6 4K Write 64.6 4K Mixed 31.3 112% 40.2 MB/s	DQ Read 243 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 79.5 96% 170 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 84.1% Great: 102%
OCZ Trion 150 480GB-$300 13,412 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 214GB free Firmware: SAFZ12.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 12497 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 346 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 171 171 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 137 (C2) HDA temperature 70 54 197569609758 (F1) Unknown 100 100 219583	73.4% Very good	Read 515 Write 354 Mixed 349 90% 406 MB/s	4K Read 27.9 4K Write 47.1 4K Mixed 9.83 80% 28.3 MB/s	DQ Read 249 DQ Write 137 DQ Mixed 47.4 74% 145 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 101%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 192GB free Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	248% Outstanding	Read 2,303 Write 1,474 Mixed 1,302 374% 1,693 MB/s	4K Read 50.6 4K Write 93.9 4K Mixed 43.9 183% 62.8 MB/s	DQ Read 321 DQ Write 171 DQ Mixed 106 116% 200 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 248% Great: 254%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 69 (03) Spinup time 135 135 34387591589 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1708 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 26788 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 233 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1819 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1819 (C2) HDA temperature 200 200 180389412894 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	61.4% Good	Read 107 Write 107 Mixed 112 82% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.52 4K Mixed 0.16 74% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 107%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1.5TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 179 177 6008 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 245 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 8268 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 211 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 52 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3558 (C2) HDA temperature 122 110 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	82% Excellent	Read 165 Write 121 Mixed 120 102% 135 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 2.25 4K Mixed 0.18 90% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 88%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119 45,158 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1TB free Firmware: 1AQ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 60 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 68 38 9881 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 399 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 27868 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 420 (B5) Unknown 80 80 434974083 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 223 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 57 184683659290 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 43 (DF) Load/unload retry count 252 252 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 514	62.4% Good	Read 99.5 Write 118 Mixed 127 87% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.01 4K Mixed 0.31 72% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 72%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60 32,476 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 489GB free Firmware: 1AG01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 72 72 9200 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4143 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 57122 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1008 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 80 1 336855060 (C2) HDA temperature 79 64 353632277 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 273381 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 2 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	53.1% Above average	Read 95.7 Write 89.5 Mixed 97.3 71% 94.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.39 4K Mixed 0.34 80% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2666 C15 2x8GB 19,779 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	46.9% Average	MC Read 16 MC Write 17.1 MC Mixed 14.9 46% 16 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 18.6 SC Mixed 16.3 51% 17.7 GB/s	Latency 127 32% 127 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X399 Taichi Builds (Compare 561 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 120%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Taichi

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	155x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	114x
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $798Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	103x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	47x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	36x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	27x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	38x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	28x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	19x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $127Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	13x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	12x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBG.SKILL $143Bench 95%, 14,506 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $932

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16