Medion MD34072/C623

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 35% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	30.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	278% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Medion MD34072/C623 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION Z370H4-EM
Memory	25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170908
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 16 '18 at 19:49
Run Duration	206 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$200 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	95.8% Outstanding	Memory 90.2 1-Core 134 2-Core 264 90% 163 Pts	4-Core 545 8-Core 799 84% 672 Pts	64-Core 965 60% 965 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 95.8% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Elitegroup(1019 1041) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.1 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	30.9% Below average	Lighting 38.7 Reflection 30.2 Parallax 36.1 32% 35 fps	MRender 38.4 Gravity 36.3 Splatting 34.7 30% 36.5 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 799GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 11776 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1846 (B1) Unknown 99 99 9 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 39 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 251 (F1) Unknown 99 99 21554623160
Poor: 80% Great: 133%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB 14,526 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 400GB free Firmware: 0 Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	77.5% Very good	Read 424 Write 416 Mixed 423 94% 421 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 38.5 4K Mixed 28.9 94% 30.5 MB/s	DQ Read 128 DQ Write 133 DQ Mixed 80.9 74% 114 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 97%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 376GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	278% Outstanding	Read 2,812 Write 1,445 Mixed 1,519 423% 1,926 MB/s	4K Read 56 4K Write 107 4K Mixed 44.9 199% 69.3 MB/s	DQ Read 550 DQ Write 249 DQ Mixed 147 176% 315 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 278% Great: 254%
Seagate Expansion 4TB 22,017 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 3.5TB free Firmware: 9300 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	61.3% Good	Read 114 Write 98.2 Mixed 79.2 73% 97.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.94 4K Write 4.15 4K Mixed 0.53 175% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 66%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2TB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 169 167 6508 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1115 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 925 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 739 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 70 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1264 (C2) HDA temperature 115 114 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	65.4% Good	Read 117 Write 111 Mixed 116 86% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 2.03 4K Mixed 0.15 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 67%
SanDisk Extreme Pro USB 3.1 128GB-$37 664 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 96GB free, PID 5588 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 15% Great: 123%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS16G4D26BFSB.16FBR 2x16GB 110 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	86.8% Excellent	MC Read 31.8 MC Write 32.9 MC Mixed 28.3 89% 31 GB/s	SC Read 18.7 SC Write 34.7 SC Mixed 25.4 75% 26.3 GB/s	Latency 67 60% 67 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 86.8% Great: 94%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MD34072/C623 Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 26%

Raft

System: Medion MD34072/C623

CPU
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	18x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	13x
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)IntelBench 5%, 147,588 samples	3x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	1x

SSD
600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 128GBIntel $98Bench 98%, 11,843 samples	10x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	1x
Ultimate SU800 256GBAdata $54Bench 91%, 40,725 samples	1x

RAM
9905678-012.A00G 1x8GBKingstonBench 41%, 2,129 samples	5x
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 22,600 samples	3x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 76%, 20,001 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $357

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16