HP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8392
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170929
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 24 '18 at 21:31
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 84.9
1-Core 107
2-Core 212
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 598
61% 492 Pts
64-Core 601
37% 601 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
HP(103C 8392) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8873
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Lighting 42.1
Reflection 29.5
Parallax 35.8
34% 35.8 fps
MRender 37.9
Gravity 38.6
Splatting 34.1
30% 36.9 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$33
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AAHA4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 2,030
Write 841
Mixed 463
241% 1,111 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 32.9
134% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 48.3
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 32.9
42% 71.6 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 177%
Great: 193%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: RDM4 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 119
Write 110
Mixed 74
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.36
4K Write 1.61
4K Mixed 0.13
101% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 67%
Kingston DT microDuo 3.0 16GB
8GB free, PID 16a3
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
28.2% Poor
Read 123
Write 37
Mixed 35.9
66% 65.4 MB/s
4K Read 9.32
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.67
58% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
74.5% Very good
MC Read 29
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 21.8
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 23.2
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx Builds (Compare 1,432 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback