Gigabyte GA-P55-US3L

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 55% Gunboat	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	26.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-P55-US3L (all builds)
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100211
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 29 '18 at 00:04
Run Duration	268 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	4%
CPU Throttled	90%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-750-$72 43,796 User benchmarks, average bench 62% Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	49.9% Average	Memory 74.7 1-Core 30.4 2-Core 59.3 38% 54.8 Pts	4-Core 138 8-Core 224 22% 181 Pts	64-Core 231 14% 231 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290 33,820 User benchmarks, average bench 29% PwrHis(1787 201C) 3GB CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.4% Poor	Lighting 36.3 Reflection 27.3 Parallax 47.6 30% 37.1 fps	MRender 26.2 Gravity 35.2 Splatting 33.4 26% 31.6 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 32%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76 24,219 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: 60AABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 66450302 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 72 72 -109873853341001 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1564 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 460 (B1) Unknown 0 0 3 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 31 49 1009320525855 (C2) HDA temperature 31 49 1009320525855 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 66450302 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 66450302 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 66450302 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 83 83 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 38101 (EA) Unknown 0 0 47792 (F1) Unknown 0 0 47792 (F2) Unknown 0 0 43860	26.7% Poor	Read 140 Write 51.5 Mixed 71.5 19% 87.7 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 35.3 4K Mixed 9.44 56% 20.5 MB/s	DQ Read 22.2 DQ Write 46.9 DQ Mixed 7.83 14% 25.7 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 69%
Samsung HM321HI 320GB-$40 12,451 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 150GB free Firmware: 2AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 1 1 35810 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 94 93 2035 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3969 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 11233 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 99 99 1747 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2671 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (BF) G-sense error rate 95 95 53955 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 89 89 111695 (C2) HDA temperature 64 45 236223660060 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 97 29 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 2 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 12048 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 4524 (F1) Unknown 90 89 14584718 (F2) Unknown 91 88 12320986 (FE) Unknown 100 100 1	39.9% Below average	Read 71.8 Write 67.1 Mixed 38.2 44% 59 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.46 4K Mixed 0.28 79% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 50%
WD WD3200AVJS-63WDA0 320GB 7,100 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 142GB free Firmware: 01.03E01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 133 132 4316 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3433 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 13313 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 304 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 109 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3433 (C2) HDA temperature 109 95 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	43.5% Average	Read 66.7 Write 84.6 Mixed 24.8 43% 58.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.47 4K Mixed 0.29 79% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 59%
JetFlash Transcend 16GB 14,782 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 3GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	7.85% Terrible	Read 33 Write 9.15 Mixed 7.99 16% 16.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 0.03 4K Mixed 0.008 17% 1.38 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.85% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x8GB 168,538 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	24.3% Poor	MC Read 8.9 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 7.4 22% 7.73 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 7.3 22% 7.57 GB/s	Latency 90.9 44% 90.9 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 67%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-P55-US3L Builds (Compare 296 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55-US3L

CPU
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	104x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	44x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	26x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	15x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	13x
GeForce GT 240NvidiaBench 4%, 11,020 samples	13x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	10x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	8x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	53x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	43x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	36x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $169

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16