Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 93% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 100% UFO	Workstation 87% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	89.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	72.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING (all builds)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170905
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 14 '18 at 18:20
Run Duration	215 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Memory 97.1 1-Core 149 2-Core 296 100% 181 Pts	4-Core 557 8-Core 929 91% 743 Pts	64-Core 1,214 75% 1,214 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 100%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85B6) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	61.3% Good	Lighting 76.5 Reflection 77.5 Parallax 67.7 62% 73.9 fps	MRender 71.5 Gravity 71.1 Splatting 74 59% 72.2 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 60%
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% EVGA(3842 4996) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1582 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	89.5% Excellent	Lighting 115 Reflection 122 Parallax 108 94% 115 fps	MRender 97.6 Gravity 104 Splatting 97.7 82% 99.6 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 89.5% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 134GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z32080RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 100 5801 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 646 (A5) Unknown 100 100 6086119786599 (A6) Unknown 100 100 7 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 22 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 14 (AE) Unknown 100 100 69 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 58 43 244813135914 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 3079504921293 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 3388 (EA) Unknown 100 100 20146 (F1) Unknown 253 253 9359 (F2) Unknown 253 253 10032 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	72.9% Very good	Read 505 Write 345 Mixed 252 81% 367 MB/s	4K Read 12.7 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 4.89 79% 39.4 MB/s	DQ Read 173 DQ Write 270 DQ Mixed 4.67 64% 149 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 86%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70 66,332 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 665GB free Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 116 99 106997064 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 270 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 69 60 9645444 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 2609 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 274 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 70 454098971 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 10 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 8680 (C2) HDA temperature 27 40 38654705691 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 36648955939615 (F1) Unknown 100 253 10114327836 (F2) Unknown 100 253 45761904326	107% Outstanding	Read 186 Write 185 Mixed 156 132% 176 MB/s	4K Read 0.86 4K Write 5.36 4K Mixed 1.13 261% 2.45 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 111%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8 33,725 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 25GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	16.8% Very poor	Read 35.7 Write 15.5 Mixed 21.5 28% 24.2 MB/s	4K Read 5.87 4K Write 2.23 4K Mixed 1.34 143% 3.15 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 16.8% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43 606,405 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	95.1% Outstanding	MC Read 36.3 MC Write 36.6 MC Mixed 26.1 94% 33 GB/s	SC Read 22.5 SC Write 40.1 SC Mixed 30 88% 30.9 GB/s	Latency 50.1 80% 50.1 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 95.1% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z370-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,622 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 93%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	676x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	302x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	196x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	146x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	145x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	132x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	79x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	63x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	50x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	84x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	35x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	30x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $709

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16