Supermicro X9DAi

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	50.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	160GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 160GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Supermicro X9DAi (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X9DAi
Memory	104.4 GB free of 160 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150509
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 19 '18 at 13:37
Run Duration	264 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 4,306 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	67.4% Good	Memory 76.7 1-Core 78.6 2-Core 157 61% 104 Pts	4-Core 313 8-Core 605 54% 459 Pts	64-Core 1,434 89% 1,434 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 71%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Msft Virtual HD 16TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 5TB free Firmware: 10.0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	46.7% Average	Read 590 Write 202 Mixed 382 86% 391 MB/s	4K Read 10.5 4K Write 10.1 4K Mixed 6.3 29% 8.97 MB/s	DQ Read 44.8 DQ Write 46.2 DQ Mixed 23.5 24% 38.2 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 50%
Dell PERC H700 9TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 4TB free Firmware: 2.10 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	61.9% Good	Read 581 Write 230 Mixed 323 83% 378 MB/s	4K Read 39.1 4K Write 23.2 4K Mixed 8.57 82% 23.6 MB/s	DQ Read 42.9 DQ Write 25.5 DQ Mixed 6.03 12% 24.8 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 62%
Dell PERC H700 6TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 761GB free Firmware: 2.10 Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 99%
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$42 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8900 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 244 (B1) Unknown 58 58 208 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 45 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 101 (F1) Unknown 99 99 49612067267	50.8% Above average	Read 468 Write 253 Mixed 119 61% 280 MB/s	4K Read 14.4 4K Write 26.8 4K Mixed 3.69 41% 15 MB/s	DQ Read 163 DQ Write 74.5 DQ Mixed 22.5 42% 86.6 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 114%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 53GB free Firmware: DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 28392 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 556 (B1) Unknown 58 58 501 (B3) Unknown 100 1 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 68 49 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 199 199 1 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 1 1 1044337 (EB) Unknown 99 99 344 (F1) Unknown 99 99 92298608951	74.8% Very good	Read 482 Write 341 Mixed 341 86% 388 MB/s	4K Read 29.7 4K Write 39.9 4K Mixed 20.8 93% 30.1 MB/s	DQ Read 193 DQ Write 119 DQ Mixed 62.3 72% 125 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 108%
Samsung MZVLV256HCHP-00000 256GB 3,154 User benchmarks, average bench 121% 51GB free Firmware: BXV7000Q Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	80.2% Excellent	Read 528 Write 250 Mixed 324 81% 368 MB/s	4K Read 29 4K Write 72.1 4K Mixed 27.5 117% 42.9 MB/s	DQ Read 217 DQ Write 159 DQ Mixed 101 99% 159 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 144%
Msft Virtual HD 9TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1.5TB free Firmware: 10.0 Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	50.6% Above average	Read 94.6 Write 81.6 Mixed 89 67% 88.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.39 4K Mixed 0.15 70% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT42GR7BFR4C HMT42GR7BFR4C Samsung M393B1K70DH0- Samsung M393B1K70DH0- Samsung M393B1K70DH0- Samsung M393B1K70DH0- Samsung M393B1K70DH0- Samsung M393B1K70DH0- Samsung M393B1K70DH0- Samsung M393B1K70D... 160GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 16384, 16384, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 16384, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	79.1% Very good	MC Read 34.3 MC Write 32.8 MC Mixed 29.1 92% 32.1 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 6.3 SC Mixed 7 21% 7.33 GB/s	Latency 86.8 46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X9DAi Builds (Compare 88 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 45%

Yacht

System: Supermicro X9DAi

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	15x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v21stBench 66%, 1,377 samples	7x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v21stBench 64%, 1,265 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	8x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	7x
RTX 3060Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	7x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	5x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x
320 Series 160GBIntel $149Bench 42%, 13,029 samples	3x

RAM
EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1 EBJ40EG8BFWB- Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1 32GBElpidaBench 91%, 25 samples	12x
M393B2G70QH0- 4x16GBSamsungBench 88%, 200 samples	5x
M393B1K70DH0- 8x8GBSamsungBench 95%, 162 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $252

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16