Asus P8H67

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive43.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H67  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 19 '18 at 17:05
Run Duration92 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 92.6
2-Core 181
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 469
48% 388 Pts
64-Core 469
29% 469 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
268GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.6% Average
Read 258
Write 177
Mixed 179
45% 204 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 28
4K Mixed 14.1
53% 18.4 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 61.3
67% 115 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 126%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 2TB
638GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 72.9
Write 51.1
Mixed 60
46% 61.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.17
4K Write 0.97
4K Mixed 0.23
51% 0.46 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
48% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 15
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 16.3
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 48%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67 Builds (Compare 977 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H67 - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $431
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback