Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 24 '18 at 14:50
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 88.1
1-Core 63.5
2-Core 122
58% 91.1 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 394
37% 309 Pts
64-Core 403
25% 403 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Palit(1569 1381) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Lighting 19.6
Reflection 15.7
Parallax 16.7
16% 17.3 fps
MRender 22.9
Gravity 19.1
Splatting 16.4
16% 19.5 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ ARC 100 240GB-$120
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 336
Write 388
Mixed 166
66% 297 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 53
4K Mixed 13.9
77% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 25.6
DQ Write 79.9
DQ Mixed 16.3
23% 40.6 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 101%
Samsung HD252HJ 250GB
83GB free
Firmware: 1AC01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 74.5
Write 80
Mixed 49
50% 67.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.98
4K Mixed 0.42
110% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 58%
Samsung HD252HJ 250GB
61GB free
Firmware: 1AC01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 78
Write 93.3
Mixed 71.1
60% 80.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 2.04
4K Mixed 0.4
107% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 58%
Samsung HD250HJ 250GB
26GB free
Firmware: FH100-06 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 69.6
Write 60.4
Mixed 36.4
41% 55.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.29
4K Mixed 0.31
76% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown OCZ3P16002G F3-2400C10-4GTX OCZ3P16002G F3-2400C10-4GTX 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.7% Average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 13.9
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 13.2
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $396
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback