Asus X99-DELUXE II

Performance Results


Gaming 72% Battleship	Desktop 101% UFO	Workstation 71% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	65.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	213% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-DELUXE II (all builds)
Memory	28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180419
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 03 '18 at 21:59
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	88%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6900K-$120 6,755 User benchmarks, average bench 86% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	99.4% Outstanding	Memory 95.3 1-Core 138 2-Core 274 94% 169 Pts	4-Core 556 8-Core 982 93% 769 Pts	64-Core 1452 90% 1452 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 99.4% Great: 98%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 3716) CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 397.31 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	65.4% Good	Lighting 83 Reflection 80.8 Parallax 69.8 68% 77.9 fps	MRender 71.6 Gravity 75.2 Splatting 76.3 61% 74.4 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 730 Series 480GB-$230 5,159 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 244GB free Firmware: L2010420 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 96 96 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6369 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2320 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 473 (AF) Unknown 100 100 4302111365 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 73 454492187 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 473 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 27 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 446004 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 0 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 42 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 109 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 99 99 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 446004 (F2) Unknown 100 100 841765	103% Outstanding	Read 519 Write 483 Mixed 475 110% 493 MB/s	4K Read 32.4 4K Write 84.4 4K Mixed 36.1 140% 50.9 MB/s	DQ Read 227 DQ Write 217 DQ Mixed 107 112% 184 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 110%
Intel 750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GB-$550 8,641 User benchmarks, average bench 186% 141GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01H0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	213% Outstanding	Read 2,112 Write 988 Mixed 1,352 327% 1,484 MB/s	4K Read 38.4 4K Write 135 4K Mixed 46.7 190% 73.4 MB/s	DQ Read 265 DQ Write 221 DQ Mixed 120 123% 202 MB/s
Poor: 123% ↑ This bench: 213% Great: 230%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215 8,416 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 3TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 241 197 6933 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1235 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3358 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1225 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 245 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 196 196 13771 (C2) HDA temperature 120 109 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	88.2% Excellent	Read 156 Write 151 Mixed 138 111% 148 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.37 4K Mixed 0.26 115% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 88.2% Great: 97%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1.5TB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 36 (03) Spinup time 253 171 933 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4364 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 81 81 14211 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4210 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 730 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 180 180 62842 (C2) HDA temperature 120 107 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	65.3% Good	Read 116 Write 111 Mixed 112 85% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.84 4K Write 2.25 4K Mixed 0.21 100% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C12 4x8GB 1,118 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	132% Outstanding	MC Read 54.3 MC Write 54.3 MC Mixed 47.5 149% 52 GB/s	SC Read 15.1 SC Write 24.7 SC Mixed 21.8 59% 20.5 GB/s	Latency 56.3 71% 56.3 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 132% Great: 117%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-DELUXE II Builds (Compare 848 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 89%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE II - $452

CPU
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	200x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	170x
Core i7-6900KIntel $120Bench 86%, 6,755 samples	97x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	177x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	86x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	64x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	42x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	40x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	36x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	18x
CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 32GBCorsairBench 134%, 17 samples	16x
CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- 32GBCorsairBench 127%, 15 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $1,076

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus X99-DELUXE II

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE II - $452

Feedback

PC Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)