Asus P8Z77-V PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	22.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8Z77-V PRO (all builds)
Memory	4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130314
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	May 04 '18 at 18:38
Run Duration	184 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136 185,516 User benchmarks, average bench 68% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	84.9% Excellent	Memory 97.7 1-Core 107 2-Core 213 81% 139 Pts	4-Core 417 8-Core 416 56% 417 Pts	64-Core 421 26% 421 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% MSI(1462 2871) 2GB CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	22.1% Poor	Lighting 26.1 Reflection 24.3 Parallax 35.3 21% 28.6 fps	MRender 32.8 Gravity 30.5 Splatting 25.3 24% 29.5 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Transcend SSD320 64GB-$128 262 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.2.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 9802441 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 80 80 -136485470714484 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1779 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 675 (B1) Unknown 0 0 7 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 36 54 34363277348 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 9802441 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 9802441 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 9802441 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 97 97 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 14272 (EA) Unknown 0 0 9637 (F1) Unknown 0 0 9637 (F2) Unknown 0 0 11534
Poor: 26% Great: 48%
Seagate ST3500830AS 500GB-$145 6,517 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 439GB free Firmware: 3.AAD Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 101 90 152504926 (03) Spinup time 93 93 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5923 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 87 60 633835716 (09) Power-on hours count 67 67 29420 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5850 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 59 42 689045545 (C2) HDA temperature 41 58 47244640297 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 52 46 156839086 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 2 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 2 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 98 251 2	43.3% Average	Read 73.5 Write 77.3 Mixed 70.4 56% 73.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 1.31 4K Mixed 0.37 90% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 44%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 295GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 142 142 70 (03) Spinup time 111 111 17193238736 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1641 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 118 118 33 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 9618 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1637 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1810 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1810 (C2) HDA temperature 193 193 201863921695 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	76.3% Very good	Read 155 Write 111 Mixed 129 99% 132 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.68 4K Mixed 0.14 68% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 103%
ST2000DM 001-1ER164 2TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 1.5TB free, PID 0718 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	16.1% Very poor	Read 32.1 Write 30.2 Mixed 31.1 40% 31.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.54 4K Mixed 0.23 62% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL10-11-11 D3-2133 2x4GB 298 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	80.1% Excellent	MC Read 29.8 MC Write 29.9 MC Mixed 25.8 81% 28.5 GB/s	SC Read 21.1 SC Write 18.6 SC Mixed 20.3 57% 20 GB/s	Latency 47.2 85% 47.2 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8Z77-V PRO Builds (Compare 2,080 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V PRO - $400

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	826x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	553x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	316x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	139x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	138x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	125x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	113x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	72x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	69x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	61x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	59x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	42x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $855

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16