Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 40% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	43% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X399-E GAMING (all builds)
Memory	27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170821
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 15 '18 at 11:18
Run Duration	196 Seconds
Run User	COL-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225 23,641 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	61% Good	Memory 49 1-Core 103 2-Core 200 62% 117 Pts	4-Core 390 8-Core 725 67% 557 Pts	64-Core 2,265 140% 2,265 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85C5) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 397.31 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43% Average	Lighting 44.8 Reflection 70.5 Parallax 72 36% 62.4 fps	MRender 67.9 Gravity 66.2 Splatting 68.8 56% 67.6 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$42 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 149GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF300000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 119 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 53 (A5) Unknown 100 100 98 (A6) Unknown 100 100 2 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 4 (A9) Unknown 100 100 215 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 2 (AE) Unknown 100 100 4 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 42 180388626468 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 120261705756 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 299 (EA) Unknown 100 100 752 (F1) Unknown 100 100 302 (F2) Unknown 100 100 259 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	28.4% Poor	Read 479 Write 46.8 Mixed 33.3 39% 186 MB/s	4K Read 7.12 4K Write 8.19 4K Mixed 3.21 19% 6.18 MB/s	DQ Read 19.7 DQ Write 18.1 DQ Mixed 3.51 7% 13.8 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 55%
USB DISK 3.0 16GB 1,966 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 5GB free, PID 5500 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	10.9% Very poor	Read 29.9 Write 12.2 Mixed 13.5 20% 18.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 0.95 4K Mixed 0.68 72% 2.01 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C14 2x16GB 761 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	60.8% Good	MC Read 25.5 MC Write 21.7 MC Mixed 22.4 66% 23.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.5 SC Write 15.1 SC Mixed 15.5 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 165 24% 165 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 115%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 122%

UFO

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 148%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	29x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	15x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	14x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	16x
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 8x8GBG.SKILLBench 125%, 648 samples	7x
CMR16GX4M2A2666C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 82%, 731 samples	7x

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $874

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16