User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 21% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	TriGem DREAMSYS
Motherboard	ECS CHICAGO2
Memory	0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1280 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110421
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	May 24 '18 at 07:53
Run Duration	176 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89 68,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	46.3% Average	Memory 79.8 1-Core 42.6 2-Core 71.2 44% 64.5 Pts	4-Core 78.5 8-Core 79.8 11% 79.2 Pts	64-Core 79.3 5% 79.3 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel G41 Express Chipset 33,874 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Elitegroup(1019 2278) 799MB Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.1749 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.48% Terrible	Lighting 0.6 Reflection 0.58 Parallax 0.56 0% 0.58 fps	MRender 0.33 Gravity 0.37 Splatting 0.83 0% 0.51 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.48% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 597GB free Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 82 75 173634831 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 289 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 277678 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 391 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 68 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 57 672858149 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 290 (C2) HDA temperature 37 22 94489280549 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 9 9 173634831 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -3689376907140 (F1) Unknown 100 253 704412334 (F2) Unknown 100 253 16209441	86.6% Excellent	Read 137 Write 165 Mixed 49 86% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.85 4K Write 1.62 4K Mixed 0.29 98% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 86.6% Great: 113%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39 64,707 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 200GB free Firmware: 01.03E01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 10 (03) Spinup time 131 125 4441 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1977 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3612 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1075 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 366 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1976 (C2) HDA temperature 98 92 45 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	56.3% Above average	Read 99.2 Write 96.6 Mixed 32.4 56% 76.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.99 4K Mixed 0.37 107% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 60%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$26 56,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: 58.01D58 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 154 151 3291 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2151 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 73 73 19744 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2142 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 288 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2197 (C2) HDA temperature 96 88 47 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	28.2% Poor	Read 52.9 Write 45 Mixed 47.9 37% 48.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.29 4K Write 1.65 4K Mixed 0.27 73% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown KTW149-ELD 2x1GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	21.9% Poor	MC Read 6.9 MC Write 6.5 MC Mixed 6.7 19% 6.7 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 7.2 19% 6.57 GB/s	Latency 81 49% 81 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 21.9% Great: 28%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

User System

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)