Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 1,235 User benchmarks, average bench 60% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	61.6% Good	Memory 72.1 1-Core 71.2 2-Core 141 56% 94.6 Pts	4-Core 277 8-Core 423 43% 350 Pts	64-Core 1,045 65% 1,045 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% PNY(196E 11C0) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.19 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	27.7% Poor	Lighting 34.3 Reflection 24.5 Parallax 30.8 28% 29.9 fps	MRender 37.9 Gravity 31.4 Splatting 31 27% 33.4 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$63 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 419GB free Firmware: CC4C Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	94.1% Outstanding	Read 175 Write 153 Mixed 160 122% 163 MB/s	4K Read 0.87 4K Write 1.35 4K Mixed 0.28 93% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 94.1% Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$63 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 347GB free Firmware: CC4C Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	76% Very good	Read 135 Write 130 Mixed 144 103% 137 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 1.33 4K Mixed 0.28 80% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$63 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 234GB free Firmware: CC26 Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	82.8% Excellent	Read 129 Write 160 Mixed 152 111% 147 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.38 4K Mixed 0.18 68% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 230GB free (System drive) Firmware: KC45 Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	63.5% Good	Read 112 Write 109 Mixed 100 81% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.26 4K Mixed 0.46 102% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung-00CE M393B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GB 1,049 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 4 of 16 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	45.7% Average	MC Read 19.2 MC Write 17.3 MC Mixed 15.6 50% 17.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 6 21% 7.4 GB/s	Latency 96.7 41% 96.7 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 98%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples	91x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	76x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 01stBench 67%, 1,642 samples	75x

GPU
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples	39x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	36x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	33x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	26x
MX500 500GBCrucial $48Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	21x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	19x

RAM
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsung-00CEBench 79%, 545 samples	33x
HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 4x8GBHynix-00ADBench 78%, 761 samples	28x
HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 8x8GBHynix-00ADBench 87%, 150 samples	26x

Value: 23% - Poor

Total price: $109

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16