Asus P8P67 DELUXE

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 42% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	56.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67 DELUXE (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121031
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 04 '18 at 21:21
Run Duration	233 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	83.1% Excellent	Memory 96.3 1-Core 113 2-Core 204 81% 138 Pts	4-Core 378 8-Core 546 58% 462 Pts	64-Core 559 35% 559 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549 37,353 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Sapphire(174B E285) CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.5.1 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	56.4% Above average	Lighting 69.5 Reflection 60.4 Parallax 88.2 57% 72.7 fps	MRender 60.7 Gravity 60.1 Splatting 78.7 56% 66.5 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 55%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 238GB free Firmware: DXM0 Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	55.1% Above average	Read 377 Write 136 Mixed 199 52% 237 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 36.3 4K Mixed 21 83% 27.2 MB/s	DQ Read 186 DQ Write 107 DQ Mixed 57.7 67% 117 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 116%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 233GB free Firmware: EXT0 Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	49.5% Average	Read 367 Write 94.1 Mixed 140 43% 200 MB/s	4K Read 27.6 4K Write 25.5 4K Mixed 17.9 78% 23.6 MB/s	DQ Read 180 DQ Write 74.1 DQ Mixed 54.2 59% 103 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 118%
Intel X25-M 80GB 12,660 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2CV102HD Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 4 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 56072 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 722 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 441 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 271160 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 1945 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 4 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 4112795390 (E8) Unknown 99 99 0 (E9) Unknown 96 96 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0	38.7% Below average	Read 253 Write 77 Mixed 118 32% 149 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 51.3 4K Mixed 7.16 67% 26.2 MB/s	DQ Read 157 DQ Write 71.3 DQ Mixed 47.4 53% 92 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 44%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 466GB free Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 112 99 46263961 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 154 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 87 60 523201867 (09) Power-on hours count 42 42 51444 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 74 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 53 605618212 (C2) HDA temperature 36 47 81604378660 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 35 27 46263961 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -71210557716077 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3904835895 (F2) Unknown 100 253 22493441	62.9% Good	Read 110 Write 109 Mixed 23.8 59% 80.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.68 4K Mixed 0.61 127% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 70%
Seagate Constellation ES.3 1TB-$22 9,374 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 375GB free Firmware: LV40 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 81 63 155538650 (03) Spinup time 96 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4193 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 85 60 399257930 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 18670 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 121 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 57 55 723255339 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 32 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 4729 (C2) HDA temperature 43 45 77309411371 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 22 11 155538650 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	80% Excellent	Read 138 Write 140 Mixed 33.5 76% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1.35 4K Write 2.53 4K Mixed 0.56 166% 1.48 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 103%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80 31,610 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 96GB free Firmware: 3.AAK Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 109 80 116638587 (03) Spinup time 96 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9432 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 89 60 842993582 (09) Power-on hours count 51 51 43560 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1557 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 55 39 -134521913278419 (C2) HDA temperature 45 61 38654705709 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 61 48 29594167 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	30.5% Below average	Read 52.8 Write 53.3 Mixed 39.1 36% 48.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 1.57 4K Mixed 0.2 67% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GB 5,448 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1800 MHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	66% Good	MC Read 23.9 MC Write 23 MC Mixed 21.2 65% 22.7 GB/s	SC Read 18.4 SC Write 19.3 SC Mixed 20.4 55% 19.4 GB/s	Latency 52.8 76% 52.8 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67 DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,057 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 DELUXE - $100

CPU
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	582x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	159x
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	105x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	75x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	60x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	60x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	41x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	36x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $129Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	32x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	50x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	39x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $728

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16