Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 82% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 82% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	90.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	154% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte AX370-Gaming
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming-CF (all builds)
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180417
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 09 '18 at 22:51
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	ZAF-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	84.3% Excellent	Memory 81.3 1-Core 117 2-Core 230 80% 143 Pts	4-Core 468 8-Core 858 79% 663 Pts	64-Core 1,285 80% 1,285 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 84.3% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400 91,676 User benchmarks, average bench 87% AMD(1002 6B76) CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.5.2 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	90.3% Outstanding	Lighting 110 Reflection 89.9 Parallax 157 90% 119 fps	MRender 86.6 Gravity 113 Splatting 128 92% 109 fps
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 90.3% Great: 94%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 323GB free Firmware: EXM03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2837 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 401 (B1) Unknown 99 99 15 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 46 39 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 110 (F1) Unknown 99 99 9578708510	120% Outstanding	Read 516 Write 503 Mixed 506 114% 508 MB/s	4K Read 42.4 4K Write 96.2 4K Mixed 52.9 183% 63.8 MB/s	DQ Read 308 DQ Write 242 DQ Mixed 134 138% 228 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 124%
Toshiba THNSN5256GPUK NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 23,829 User benchmarks, average bench 109% 128GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5KDA4101 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	154% Outstanding	Read 1,622 Write 419 Mixed 501 183% 847 MB/s	4K Read 31.3 4K Write 88.8 4K Mixed 56.1 166% 58.7 MB/s	DQ Read 305 DQ Write 164 DQ Mixed 106 113% 192 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 154% Great: 141%
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 32GB free Firmware: DXT09B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 7863 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2228 (B1) Unknown 91 91 106 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 58 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 577 (F1) Unknown 99 99 16320666667	66% Good	Read 505 Write 133 Mixed 192 60% 277 MB/s	4K Read 28 4K Write 80.7 4K Mixed 10.8 99% 39.8 MB/s	DQ Read 313 DQ Write 126 DQ Mixed 28.4 71% 156 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 73%
WD WD15EZRX-00DC0B0 1.5TB 1,212 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 160GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 176 168 4175 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2594 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 8317 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2034 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 482 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 169 169 95415 (C2) HDA temperature 111 104 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	63.4% Good	Read 115 Write 106 Mixed 77.1 74% 99.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.84 4K Mixed 0.18 81% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43 606,405 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	MC Read 39.9 MC Write 38.2 MC Mixed 35.5 108% 37.9 GB/s	SC Read 24.4 SC Write 38.3 SC Mixed 28.9 87% 30.5 GB/s	Latency 78.2 51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 356 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming-CF

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	72x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	39x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	32x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	37x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	31x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	28x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $129Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	10x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $89Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	8x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	8x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	13x
DDR4 2400 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 76%, 26,065 samples	13x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $40Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $527

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16