Asus F2A85-M

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	31.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus F2A85-M (all builds)
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140711
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 11 '18 at 18:08
Run Duration	207 Seconds
Run User	BIH-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-5600K APU-$250 14,744 User benchmarks, average bench 49% FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	59.1% Above average	Memory 83.2 1-Core 63.7 2-Core 120 56% 89.1 Pts	4-Core 205 8-Core 202 27% 204 Pts	64-Core 203 13% 203 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290 33,820 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 254C) 3GB CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.3.2 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	31.1% Below average	Lighting 40.3 Reflection 29.2 Parallax 53.7 33% 41 fps	MRender 27.8 Gravity 37.4 Splatting 35.7 28% 33.6 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 32%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 470 Series SSD 256GB 462 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 60GB free Firmware: AXM0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 27825 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3141 (B1) Unknown 95 95 215 (B2) Unknown 81 81 762 (BE) vendor-specific 67 51 33 (EB) Unknown 99 99 19	48% Average	Read 264 Write 250 Mixed 258 58% 257 MB/s	4K Read 15.7 4K Write 40.9 4K Mixed 11.7 60% 22.8 MB/s	DQ Read 120 DQ Write 75 DQ Mixed 12.9 32% 69.3 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 53%
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 20248 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2495 (B1) Unknown 84 84 153 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 45 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 1 430 (F1) Unknown 99 99 33632766441	54.8% Above average	Read 460 Write 132 Mixed 115 51% 236 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 45.5 4K Mixed 12.7 80% 28.2 MB/s	DQ Read 128 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 27.9 44% 85.9 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 85%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170 41,439 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 446GB free Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 179 178 6008 (04) Start/Stop count 87 87 13522 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 52 52 35389 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3495 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 326 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 125 125 225604 (C2) HDA temperature 117 99 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	29.4% Poor	Read 50.4 Write 51.9 Mixed 50.6 38% 51 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 0.14 4K Mixed 0.15 48% 0.32 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 63%
WD Black 500GB (2012)-$47 20,548 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 104GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 175 173 2233 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6758 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 16176 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1818 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 235 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 6529 (C2) HDA temperature 110 93 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	59.6% Above average	Read 119 Write 88.4 Mixed 85.7 73% 97.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.77 4K Write 2.73 4K Mixed 0.3 117% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 16GB 353 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	34.7% Below average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 12.3 33% 11.7 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 7.4 SC Mixed 11.7 26% 9.3 GB/s	Latency 74.8 53% 74.8 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical F2A85-M Builds (Compare 66 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F2A85-M

CPU
A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples	15x
A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples	10x
A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)AMD $467Bench 51%, 11,295 samples	8x

GPU
Radeon HD 7480DAMDBench 2%, 8,289 samples	7x
Radeon HD 7660DAMDBench 5%, 7,665 samples	7x
Radeon HD 7560DAMDBench 4%, 10,029 samples	6x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
Series SATA SSD 120GBVBench 63%, 3,411 samples	3x
R5MP120G8 120GBBench 141%, 259 samples	3x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	5x
99U5471-030.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 27%, 790 samples	4x
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 8GBUnknownBench 33%, 442 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $147

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16