Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	43.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171019
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 21 '18 at 22:21
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-8350K-$100 23,493 User benchmarks, average bench 82% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	49.8% Average	Memory 47.6 1-Core 24.9 2-Core 76.3 30% 49.6 Pts	4-Core 279 8-Core 451 45% 365 Pts	64-Core 512 32% 512 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 93%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 398.11 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43.5% Average	Lighting 45.5 Reflection 63.4 Parallax 71.6 37% 60.2 fps	MRender 68.6 Gravity 67.4 Splatting 69.1 56% 68.4 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 745 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 462 (B1) Unknown 99 99 15 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 47 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 7 (F1) Unknown 99 99 8589217709	68.4% Good	Read 495 Write 401 Mixed 412 97% 436 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 28.6 4K Mixed 16.7 72% 23 MB/s	DQ Read 27.5 DQ Write 79.4 DQ Mixed 13.5 22% 40.2 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 124%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 60,540 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 7GB free Firmware: 0502 Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	32.2% Below average	Read 58.7 Write 53.3 Mixed 43.2 39% 51.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.34 4K Write 1.62 4K Mixed 0.33 81% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2666 C15 2x4GB-$47 29,751 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	68.4% Good	MC Read 25.2 MC Write 32 MC Mixed 26.5 80% 27.9 GB/s	SC Read 6.3 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 8.6 23% 8 GB/s	Latency 170 24% 170 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 98%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 93%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	115x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	105x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	97x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	145x
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	89x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	83x

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $856

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16