Asus CM6870

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus CM6870  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CM6870
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120224
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 22 '18 at 14:41
Run Duration478 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
79% Very good
Memory 88
1-Core 103
2-Core 204
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 516
57% 450 Pts
64-Core 517
32% 517 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 79%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Asus(1043 83E2) 2GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.43
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.97% Terrible
Lighting 4.33
Reflection 4.08
Parallax 4.62
4% 4.35 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 5.07
Splatting 7.04
5% 5.74 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.97%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 256GB-$400
209GB free
Firmware: 1.5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.2% Average
Read 223
Write 216
Mixed 174
46% 205 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 41.7
4K Mixed 18.2
77% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 23.6
DQ Write 96.7
DQ Mixed 18.3
26% 46.2 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 106%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 363
Write 299
Mixed 277
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 43.6
4K Mixed 21.2
94% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 42.9
DQ Write 84.2
DQ Mixed 24
30% 50.4 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
SanDisk Ultra 123GB
47GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 168
Write 76.8
Mixed 103
133% 116 MB/s
4K Read 7.75
4K Write 2.11
4K Mixed 0.48
116% 3.44 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 41%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 64GB
7GB free, PID c75c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
7.41% Terrible
Read 28.2
Write 8.96
Mixed 9.01
16% 15.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.69
4K Write 0.006
4K Mixed 0.007
22% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.41%
Great: 11%
Kingston DataTraveler G3 8GB
3GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
5.04% Terrible
Read 18.8
Write 5.51
Mixed 8.55
12% 11 MB/s
4K Read 4.55
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.03
18% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.04%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata EL64C1C1624Z1 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
56.6% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 17.3
56% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 18.9
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CM6870 Builds (Compare 644 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CM6870

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback