Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 26 '18 at 20:03
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 93.3
1-Core 122
2-Core 238
86% 151 Pts
4-Core 450
8-Core 771
74% 610 Pts
64-Core 958
59% 958 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Lighting 153
Reflection 160
Parallax 140
125% 151 fps
MRender 121
Gravity 148
Splatting 117
104% 128 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 114%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$70
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 71% Great: 119%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
747GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
55% Above average
Read 82.8
Write 109
Mixed 43.4
58% 78.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 1.76
4K Mixed 0.16
81% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55%
Great: 67%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
267GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 109
Write 90.2
Mixed 25.4
54% 74.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.74
4K Mixed 0.31
82% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 69%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
70GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
35% Below average
Read 65.6
Write 56.1
Mixed 37.9
40% 53.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.2
82% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35%
Great: 67%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
44GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 113
Write 108
Mixed 17.6
58% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.17
77% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM 2400 MHz clocked @ 2448 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 43
MC Write 45.6
MC Mixed 42.4
125% 43.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 22.8
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 61.4
65% 61.4 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 113%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,285 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $371
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback